Sanchez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 4/8/2013. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/1/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ROGER SANCHEZ, et al.,

9

Plaintiffs,

10

v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. C-13-0900 EMC

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants.
___________________________________/

13
14
15

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a motion to dismiss in the above-referenced

16

action which is currently set for hearing on May 9, 2013. See Docket No. 15 (notice). Because

17

Wells Fargo filed its motion on March 7, 2013, Plaintiffs’ opposition brief was due on March 21,

18

2013. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a) (providing that “[t]he opposition must be filed and served

19

more more than 14 days after the motion was filed”). Plaintiffs, however, have failed to file any

20

opposition.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

Accordingly, the Court hereby issues this order to show cause. Plaintiffs are ordered to show

2

cause as to why their case should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

3

Plaintiffs’ response shall be filed no later than a week from the date of this order. Plaintiffs are

4

forewarned that, if they fail to file a timely response to this order to show cause, then the Court shall

5

dismiss all claims against Wells Fargo, leaving only WSR23 World Savings Remic Trust as the sole

6

defendant.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: April 1, 2013
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2