Sugiharto v. Synarc, Inc et al

Filing 28

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 20, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 4 HUNTER PYLE, SBN 191125 TANYA TAMBLING, SBN 262979 SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE 428 13TH Street, 8th Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510.663.9240 Telefax: 510.663.9241 5 Email: 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROLINA SUGIHARTO 2 3 hpyle@ssrplaw.com, ttambling@ssrplaw.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Nick C. Geannacopulos (SBN 114822) ngeannacopulos@seyfarth.com Chantelle C. Egan (SBN 257938) cegan@seyfarth.com Ari M. Hersher (SBN 260321) ahersher@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 13 14 Attorneys for Defendants SYNARC, INC. and AARON TIMM 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 CAROLINA SUGIHARTO, 19 Plaintiff, Case No. C13-921-MMC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 21 vs. 22 SYNARC, INC.; and AARON TIMM, 23 24 Defendants. 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -1- 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 2 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 4 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 5 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 6 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 7 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 8 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The 9 parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order 10 does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 11 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission 12 from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 15 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored 17 or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 support staff). 20 21 2.4 24 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 22 23 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -2- 1 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures, in response to 2 subpoenas, or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation 4 who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in 5 this action. 6 2.7 include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 7 8 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are 11 retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of 12 that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 13 2.10 retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 14 15 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 16 17 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, and 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 18 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 19 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 20 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 21 22 2.14 23 // 24 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. // 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -3- 1 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 2 3 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 4 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 5 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections 6 conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that 7 is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public 8 domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this 9 Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information 10 known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the 11 disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of 12 confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a 13 separate agreement or order. 14 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 15 16 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 17 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 18 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 19 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits 20 for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 21 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 22 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party 23 that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such 24 designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -4- 1 must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 2 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 3 communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of 4 this Order. 5 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to 6 be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber 7 or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) 8 expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for 9 10 protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties 11 that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 12 5.2 13 second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or 14 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 15 the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., 16 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding 17 transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the 18 legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or 19 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 21 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 22 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 23 material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all 24 of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -5- 1 inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party 2 must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. 3 Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 4 “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or 5 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 6 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the 8 Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other 9 proceeding, all protected testimony. 10 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible 11 items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or 12 containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a 13 portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the 14 extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 15 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate 16 qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 17 protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving 18 Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the 19 provisions of this Order. 20 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 21 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at 22 any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to 23 avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or 24 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -6- 1 delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by 2 electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 3 6.2 4 providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. 5 To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the 6 challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the Protective 7 Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by 8 conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) within 9 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by 10 its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an 11 opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in 12 designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed 13 to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or 14 establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a 15 timely manner. 16 6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, 17 the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Civil Local Rule 7 18 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of 19 challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their 20 dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration 21 affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding 22 paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration 23 within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for 24 each challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -7- 1 confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the 2 designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this 3 provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with 4 the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. 5 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. 6 Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary 7 expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the 8 Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a motion to retain 9 confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level 10 of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the 11 challenge. 12 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 13 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by 14 another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or 15 attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of 16 persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a 17 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 18 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure 19 manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 20 7.2 21 or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or 22 item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court 23 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said 24 Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -8- 1 this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 2 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 3 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to 4 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 5 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 6 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably 7 necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 8 Bound” (Exhibit A); 9 (d) the court and its personnel; 10 (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and 11 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who 12 have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 13 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary 14 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless 15 otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed 16 deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately 17 bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this 18 Stipulated Protective Order. 19 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other 20 person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 21 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER 22 LITIGATION 23 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 24 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -9- 1 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of 2 the subpoena or court order; 3 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other 4 litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this 5 Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 6 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating 7 Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 8 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or 9 court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a 10 determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the 11 Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 12 protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed 13 as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another 14 court. 15 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS 16 LITIGATION 17 (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this action, 18 including but not limited to Plaintiff’s medical providers, and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 This includes third party responses to subpoenas. Such information produced by Non-Parties in 20 connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. 21 Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking 22 additional protections. 23 24 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -10- 1 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-Party’s 2 confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the Non- 3 Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall: 4 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of 5 the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; 6 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this 7 litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the 8 information requested; and 9 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party. 10 (c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 21 days of 11 receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non- 12 Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely 13 seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession 14 or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a 15 determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the 16 burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 17 18 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material 19 to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the 20 Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized 21 disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) 22 inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, 23 and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 24 that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -11- 1 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED 2 MATERIAL 3 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced 4 material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are 5 those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify 6 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 7 prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach 8 an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney- 9 client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated 10 protective order submitted to the court. 11 12. MISCELLANEOUS 12 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its 13 modification by the court in the future. 14 12.2 15 waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on 16 any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to 17 object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 18 12.3 19 order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record 20 in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must 21 comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court 22 order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 23 5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is 24 privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -12- 1 Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the 2 court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local 3 Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court. 4 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 5 Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each 6 Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As 7 used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, 8 and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected 9 Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the 10 Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline 11 that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or 12 destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, 13 summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding 14 this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, 15 deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, 16 expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials 17 contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material 18 remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -13- 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 3 Dated: December 16, 2013 SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE 4 5 By: _____/s/ Tanya P. Tambling Tanya P. Tambling Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROLINA SUGIHARTO 6 7 8 Dated: December 16, 2013 SEYFARTH & SHAW 9 10 By: ____/s/ Chantelle C. Egan Chantelle C. Egan Attorneys for Defendants 11 SYNARC, INC. and AARON TIMM 12 13 14 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: December 20, 2013 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE MAXINE CHESNEY 20 21 22 23 24 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -14- 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or type 4 full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the 5 Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District 6 of California on [date] in the case of Carolina Sugiharto v. Synarc, Inc. and Aaron Timm, Case No. 7 C13-921-MMC. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective 8 Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 9 punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any 10 information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in 11 strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the 12 United States District Court for the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms 13 of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 14 action. 15 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 16 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my 17 California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to 18 enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 19 Date: ______________________________________ 20 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 21 22 Printed name: _______________________________ 23 24 Signature: __________________________________ 25 SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -15-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?