Sugiharto v. Synarc, Inc et al

Filing 35

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii); ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 30, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)

2
3

HUNTER PYLE, SBN 191125
TANYA TAMBLING, SBN 262979
SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE
428 13TH Street, 81h Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone:
510.663.9240
Telefax:
510.663.9241

4

hpyl e@ssrplaw .com, ttambl ing@ssrplaw .com

Email:
5
6
7
8
9
10

11

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAROLINA SUGIHARTO
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Nick C. Geannacopulos (SBN 114822)
[e-mail]
Ari Hersher (SBN 260321)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, Califomia 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SYNARC, INC. and AARON TIMM

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16

17

CAROLINA SUGIHARTO,

Case No. C13-921-MMC

18

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED
STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii) ;

Plaintiff,
19
20

ORDER THEREON

vs.

21

22
23

SYNARC, INC.; and AARON TIMM,
Defendants.

24
25

CAROLINA SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC AND AARON TIMM I CASE NO. C13-921-MMC
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED] ORDER

-1-

STIPULATION
2

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

3

Plaintiff CAROLINA SUGIHARTO, by and through her attorneys of record, hereby requests

4

this Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), Defendants

5

SYNARC, INC. and AARON TIMM ("Defendants") by and through their attorneys of record, represent

6

Defendants' non-objection to Plaintiffs request to dismiss her case with prejudice, and thus Defendants

7

hereby stipulate to the same. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already

8

addresses each party's obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs.

SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE

CAROLINA SUGIHARTO v. SYNARC AND AARON TIMM I CASE NO. C13-921-MMC
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

-2-

ORDER
2

The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause

3

appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court acknowledges that the parties have entered

4

into a settlement agreement that addresses the payment of their respective fees and costs.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED

6

7

8
9

June 30, 2014
Date:---------------DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MAXINE CHESNEY

10
II
12

13
14

15
16
17

18
19

20
21

22

23

24
25

CAROLINA SUGlliARTO v. SYNARC AND AARON TIMM I CASE NO. Cl3-921-MMC
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

-3-