Rodriguez v. Del Bove et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 16 Ex Parte Application Requesting Order Enlarging Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Robert D. Rodriguez.Reset Deadlines as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction FRCP Rule 12(b)(6). Replies due by 9/23/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/17/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)

1
2
3
4

Robert D. Rodriguez SBN: 242396
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ
429 13th Street
Modesto, California 95354
[phone] (telephone)
[phone] (fax)
PRO SE

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ,

11

Plaintiff,

No: 3:13-CV-00925-CRB

12

v.

13

BRIAN DEL BOVE, LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN
DEL BOVE, and unknown entity, LESLIE
MATTUCCI, TISH REESE, MARGARETHA M.
SMIT, and DOES 1 – 30, inclusive,

14
15
16

Defendants.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ROBERT D.
RODRIGUEZ’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION REQUESTING
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS
BRIAN DEL BOVE, LAW OFFICE OF
BRIAN DEL BOVE’S F.R.C.P. 12 (B) 6
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION (Civil L.R. 6-1)
Date: Ex Parte
Time: Ex Parte
Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ’S (Hereinafter “Plaintiff”) ex parte application and

22

request for order to enlarge time to file opposition to Defendants BRIAN DEL BOVE, LAW

23

OFFICE OF BRIAN DEL BOVE (Hereinafter Collectively “Defendants”) Fed. Rule of Civ. P.

24

12(B) 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction was presented on or about September 11,

25

2013, in courtroom 6, 17th Floor, the Hon. Charles R. Breyer presiding.

26
27
28

1

______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ’S EX PARTE APPLICATION REQUESTING ORDER
ENLARGING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS BRIAN DEL BOVE, LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN
DEL BOVE’S F.R.C.P. 12 (B) 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (Civil L.R. 6-1)

1
2
3

The ruling of the order of court is as follows:
The matter having been submitted and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS NOW THE ORDER OF THIS COURT – Plaintiff ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ’S

4
ex parte application and request for order to enlarge time to file opposition to Defendants BRIAN
5
6

DEL BOVE, LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN DEL BOVE’S Fed. Rule of Civ. P. 12(B) 6 Motion to

7

Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion being filed

8

on September 16, 2013, defendant’s reply due September 23, 2013.

9
DATED: September 17, 2013

S

13

FO

H

ER

LI

RT

15

_______________________________________
r
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGEs R. Breye
e Charle
Judg

NO

14

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

12

RT
U
O

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

16
17

A

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ’S EX PARTE APPLICATION REQUESTING ORDER
ENLARGING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS BRIAN DEL BOVE, LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN
DEL BOVE’S F.R.C.P. 12 (B) 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (Civil L.R. 6-1)