Eco Friendly Energy Company v. Clearedge Power

Filing 32

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/9/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ECO FRIENDLY ENERGY COMPANY, Case No. 13-cv-00932-RS Plaintiff, 10 v. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CLEAREDGE POWER, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendant. 13 14 15 This action has been stayed since shortly after it was filed in 2013. Twice plaintiff has 16 allowed over a year to elapse without filing any status reports, despite being under order to file 17 such reports every 180 days. In response to the most recent order to show cause, plaintiff asserts it 18 expects this matter to be resolved in the context of defendant’s bankruptcy proceedings within the 19 next six months. Plaintiff offers no explanation for its failure to comply with its prior reporting 20 obligations. It requests that the matter not be dismissed at this juncture, and that the OSC instead 21 be continued for six months. 22 The request is granted. No later than September 30, 2016, plaintiff shall file a further 23 response to the order to show cause. In the event plaintiff does not respond, the action will be 24 dismissed without further notice. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: March 9, 2016 27 28 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?