Eco Friendly Energy Company v. Clearedge Power
Filing
32
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/9/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ECO FRIENDLY ENERGY COMPANY,
Case No. 13-cv-00932-RS
Plaintiff,
10
v.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
CLEAREDGE POWER,
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED
Defendant.
13
14
15
This action has been stayed since shortly after it was filed in 2013. Twice plaintiff has
16
allowed over a year to elapse without filing any status reports, despite being under order to file
17
such reports every 180 days. In response to the most recent order to show cause, plaintiff asserts it
18
expects this matter to be resolved in the context of defendant’s bankruptcy proceedings within the
19
next six months. Plaintiff offers no explanation for its failure to comply with its prior reporting
20
obligations. It requests that the matter not be dismissed at this juncture, and that the OSC instead
21
be continued for six months.
22
The request is granted. No later than September 30, 2016, plaintiff shall file a further
23
response to the order to show cause. In the event plaintiff does not respond, the action will be
24
dismissed without further notice.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: March 9, 2016
27
28
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?