Eco Friendly Energy Company v. Clearedge Power

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/31/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ECO FRIENDLY ENERGY COMPANY,

Case No. 13-cv-00932-RS

Plaintiff,
13
v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

14
15

CLEAREDGE POWER,
Defendant.

16
17
18

In March of 2016, an order issued noting that this action had been stayed since shortly after

19

it was filed in 2013. Twice plaintiff had allowed over a year to elapse without filing any status

20

reports, despite being under order to file such reports every 180 days. Plaintiff had responded to a

21

then-recent order to show cause by asserting it expected the matter to be resolved in the context of

22

defendant’s bankruptcy proceedings within the next six months. Plaintiff offered no explanation

23

for its failure to comply with its prior reporting obligations. Plaintiff requested the matter not to

24

be dismissed at that juncture, and that the OSC instead be continued for six months.

25

The March 2016 order granted that request and directed plaintiff to file a further response

26

to the order to show cause no later than September 30, 2016. Plaintiff was warned that if it did not

27

respond, the action would be dismissed without further notice. That deadline having passed, and

28

no further filings having been made, this action is hereby dismissed.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

Dated: March 31, 2017
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
CASE NO. 13-cv-00932-RS

28
2