Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Crane et al

Filing 91

ORDER. Signed by Judge Chhabria on 2/3/2015. (vclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 REQUEST FOR FURTHER BRIEFING v. ROSEMARY A. CRANE, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 13-cv-00945-VC 12 13 14 15 The Court invites the parties to file supplemental briefs that address the following questions: Paragraphs 54 and 55 of the TAC allege that Epocrates' practice before the IPO was to 16 extend the terms of pharmaceutical customers' contracts in response to delays by the 17 pharmaceutical companies in producing or approving DocAlerts. The TAC further alleges that, 18 around the time of the IPO, Epocrates changed this practice and began convincing pharmaceutical 19 companies to agree to cancel their contracts prematurely, to allow Epocrates to recognize revenue 20 from the unused DocAlerts immediately upon cancellation. Was Epocrates required to disclose 21 this change to the investing public, regardless of the content of the "replacement contracts" that 22 were part of the alleged "repapering scheme?" If so, why, and under what authority? 23 The plaintiff should file its supplemental brief, which should not exceed 10 double-spaced 24 pages, by February 13, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. The defendant's response, of the same length, should be 25 filed by February 20, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. The plaintiff may file a reply, not to exceed five pages, 26 by 3:00 p.m. on February 27, 2015. 27 28 The parties should limit their discussion to these questions and should not reargue any of the other issues. 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2014 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?