Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Crane et al

Filing 97

Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 96 Stipulation to Reschedule the Case Management Conference and for Extension of Time to Answer Third Amended Complaint.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

DEBORAH S. BIRNBACH (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
53 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Tel:
617.570.1000
Fax:
617.523.1231
Michael T. Jones (SBN 290660)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Tel.:
650.752.3100
Fax.: [phone]
Teodora E. Manolova (SBN 233333)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 S. Figueroa St., 41st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.:
213.426.2500
Fax.: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Epocrates, Inc., Rosemary A. Crane,
and Patrick D. Spangler

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, Individually and
On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiffs,
v.
ROSEMARY A. CRANE, PATRICK D.
SPANGLER, and EPOCRATES, INC.,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-CV-00945-VC
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
AS MODIFIED
Dept:
4, 17th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Vince Chhabria

25
26
27
28
303992.1 EPOCRATES STIPULATION

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE & FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. 3:13CV-00945-VC)

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, Defendants Rosemary A. Crane, Patrick D.

2 Spangler, and Epocrates, Inc. (“Defendants”) and Lead Plaintiff Police and Fire Retirement System
3 of the City of Detroit (“Lead Plaintiff”) (collectively “Parties”) hereby agree and stipulate that good
4 cause exists to request an order from the Court: (i) extending Defendants’ time to answer Lead
5 Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint; and (ii) rescheduling the April 7, 2015 telephonic case
6 management conference to April 14, 2015.
RECITALS

7
8

WHEREAS, on March 13, 2015, the Court issued an Order denying Defendants’ motion to

9 dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), and scheduling a telephonic case management
10 conference for April 7, 2015;
11

WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts for Defendants’ counsel, Defendants have

12 requested, and Lead Plaintiff has agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to reschedule the
13 April 7, 2015 telephonic case management conference to April 14, 2015;
14

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), the March 27, 2015 deadline by

15 which Defendants are to answer or otherwise respond to the TAC has not yet expired;
16

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Lead Plaintiff has agreed, to extend by thirty

17 days the time for the Defendants to answer the TAC;
18

WHEREAS, this is the first request for a modification of the schedule following the

19 Court’s March 13, 2015 order; and
20

WHEREAS, the Parties do not seek to reset these dates for the purpose of delay, and the

21 proposed new dates will not have an effect on any pre-trial and trial dates as the Court has yet to
22 schedule these dates.
23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties through their

24 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
25

1.

The April 7, 2015 telephonic case management conference is rescheduled to an

26 April 14, 2015 telephonic case management conference, and all related deadlines reset accordingly.
27

2.

Defendants shall answer the TAC by or before April 27, 2015.

28

3.

This Stipulation is entered into without prejudice to any party seeking any interim
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE & FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. 3:13-CV-00945-VC)

1 relief.
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3 Dated: March 20, 2015

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

4
By: /s/ Michael T. Jones

5

Michael T. Jones (# 290660)
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9

Deborah S. Birnbach (admitted pro hac vice)
Exchange Place
53 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

17

Teodora E. Manolova (# 233333)
601 S. Figueroa St., 41st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
[e-mail]

18

Counsel for Defendants

15
16

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: March 20, 2015

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP
By: /s/ Joshua L. Crowell
Lionel Z. Glancy (# 134180)
Michael Goldberg (#188669)
Joshua L. Crowell (admitted pro hac vice)
Robert V. Prongay (#270796)
Casey E. Sadler (#274241)
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE & FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. 3:13-CV-00945-VC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

SCOTT+SCOTT LLP
Beth A. Kaswan (admitted pro hac vice)
Deborah Clark-Weintraub (admitted pro hac vice)
Amanda F. Lawrence (admitted pro hac vice)
The Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Avenue 40th Floor
New York, NY 10174
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

7
8

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE & FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. 3:13-CV-00945-VC)

The plaintiff shall provide the Court and opposing counsel a conference line no later than 3 court days

1

before the telephonic conference.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

25
DATED: March _______, 2015

4
5
6
7

___________________________________
Honorable Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE & FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. 3:13-CV-00945-VC)