Schwarzer v. UFCW-Northern California Employer's Joint Pension Plan
Filing
28
ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR 27 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Replies due by 12/16/2013. The court CONTINUES the hearing on Defendants' motion for summary judgment from December 19, 2013 to Ja nuary 16, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/31/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
WILLIAM SCHWARZ,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
UFCW-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION PLAN,
15
16
17
No. C13-00977 LB
ORDER REGARDING THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Re: ECF No. 27]
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
In this case, Plaintiff William Schwarz has sued Defendant UFCW-Northern California
18
Employers Joint Pension Plan to recover disability benefits to which he claims he is entitled. See
19
generally Complaint, ECF No. 1. In their first joint case management conference statement, the
20
parties requested larger then usual time periods for the briefing on their summary judgment motions.
21
See 5/31/2013 CMC Statement, ECF No. 13 at 7-8. Specifically, they asked that October 15, 2013
22
be set as the deadline for the parties to file motions for summary judgment, that November 15, 2013
23
be set as the deadline for oppositions to those motions, and that December 15, 2013 be set as the
24
deadline for replies in support of those motions. Id. After the initial case management conference
25
that was held on June 6, 2013, the court set the briefing deadlines that the parties requested (except
26
that the court set the deadline for filing replies on December 16, 2013—one day later than
27
requested—because December 15, 2013 is a Sunday). CMC Order, ECF No. 16 at 2. The court also
28
set January 16, 2014 as the last day for hearing those motions. Id.
C 13-00977 LB
ORDER
1
On October 15, 2013, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment and noticed it for hearing
2
on December 19, 2013. Motion, ECF No. 27. When filing the motion on the court’s Electronic
3
Case File (“ECF”), Defendant correctly set the deadline for the opposition on November 15, 2013,
4
but incorrectly set the deadline for the reply on December 12, 2013. As described above, the court
5
previously set the deadline for the reply on December 16, 2013, so the court will reset that deadline
6
within ECF.
7
This corrected reply deadline (and even the incorrect one, frankly), however, does not provide
upon an extremely large administrative record, before the December 19, 2013 hearing date.
10
Moreover, when the court allowed the parties to have long periods between briefs, the court
11
contemplated having additional time for itself to review those briefs and issue an order on the
12
For the Northern District of California
the court much time to review the by-then fully briefed summary judgment motion, which relies
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
motion, and as such set the deadline for hearing dispositive motions on January 16, 2014. While
13
Defendant properly noticed its motion for hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7, given the situation
14
described above, the court believes that continuing the hearing from December 19, 2013 to January
15
16, 2014 is appropriate. Accordingly, the court CONTINUES the hearing on Defendants’ motion
16
for summary judgment from December 19, 2013 to January 16, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C,
17
15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California,
18
94102.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 13-00977 LB
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?