Schwarzer v. UFCW-Northern California Employer's Joint Pension Plan

Filing 28

ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR 27 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Replies due by 12/16/2013. The court CONTINUES the hearing on Defendants' motion for summary judgment from December 19, 2013 to Ja nuary 16, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/31/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division WILLIAM SCHWARZ, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 Plaintiff, v. UFCW-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION PLAN, 15 16 17 No. C13-00977 LB ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Re: ECF No. 27] Defendant. _____________________________________/ In this case, Plaintiff William Schwarz has sued Defendant UFCW-Northern California 18 Employers Joint Pension Plan to recover disability benefits to which he claims he is entitled. See 19 generally Complaint, ECF No. 1. In their first joint case management conference statement, the 20 parties requested larger then usual time periods for the briefing on their summary judgment motions. 21 See 5/31/2013 CMC Statement, ECF No. 13 at 7-8. Specifically, they asked that October 15, 2013 22 be set as the deadline for the parties to file motions for summary judgment, that November 15, 2013 23 be set as the deadline for oppositions to those motions, and that December 15, 2013 be set as the 24 deadline for replies in support of those motions. Id. After the initial case management conference 25 that was held on June 6, 2013, the court set the briefing deadlines that the parties requested (except 26 that the court set the deadline for filing replies on December 16, 2013—one day later than 27 requested—because December 15, 2013 is a Sunday). CMC Order, ECF No. 16 at 2. The court also 28 set January 16, 2014 as the last day for hearing those motions. Id. C 13-00977 LB ORDER 1 On October 15, 2013, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment and noticed it for hearing 2 on December 19, 2013. Motion, ECF No. 27. When filing the motion on the court’s Electronic 3 Case File (“ECF”), Defendant correctly set the deadline for the opposition on November 15, 2013, 4 but incorrectly set the deadline for the reply on December 12, 2013. As described above, the court 5 previously set the deadline for the reply on December 16, 2013, so the court will reset that deadline 6 within ECF. 7 This corrected reply deadline (and even the incorrect one, frankly), however, does not provide upon an extremely large administrative record, before the December 19, 2013 hearing date. 10 Moreover, when the court allowed the parties to have long periods between briefs, the court 11 contemplated having additional time for itself to review those briefs and issue an order on the 12 For the Northern District of California the court much time to review the by-then fully briefed summary judgment motion, which relies 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 motion, and as such set the deadline for hearing dispositive motions on January 16, 2014. While 13 Defendant properly noticed its motion for hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7, given the situation 14 described above, the court believes that continuing the hearing from December 19, 2013 to January 15 16, 2014 is appropriate. Accordingly, the court CONTINUES the hearing on Defendants’ motion 16 for summary judgment from December 19, 2013 to January 16, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 17 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 18 94102. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2013 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 13-00977 LB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?