Carter v. Kyocera Technology Development
Filing
60
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Because Plaintiff Darryl Carter has requested and is in need of counsel to assist her in this matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, Monique Oliver of Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Oliver LLP is hereby appointed as counsel for Mr. Carter in this matter. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/14/2014. (lblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRYL CARTER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KYOCERA TECH. DEV., et al.
Defendants.
)
)
) Case Number: 13-cv-01002 LB
)
) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
Because Plaintiff Darryl Carter has requested and is in need of counsel to assist her in this
matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the
request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, Monique Oliver of Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Oliver LLP
is hereby appointed as counsel for Mr. Carter in this matter.
The scope of this referral shall be for:
all purposes for the duration of the case
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
mediation
early neutral evaluation
settlement conference
briefing
and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for
summary judgment or motion to dismiss):
__________________________________________________________
discovery as follows:
__________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
other:
__________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this
order. Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project
Guidelines posted on the Court’s website.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2014
United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?