Caovilla et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 4/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/17/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14

DAWNEEN PARDINI CAOVILLA;
DAVID CAOVILLA,
Plaintiffs,

15
16

Case No.: 13-cv-1003 JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

17
18
19

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

20
21

Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint,

22

filed March 21, 2013. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiffs have not filed an Opposition or Statement of

23

non-opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, as required by Local Rule 7-3(b). Accordingly, the

24

Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be

25

dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs should file a response to the ORDER to SHOW

26

CAUSE, along with a response to the Motion to Dismiss, on or before April 25, 2013. If no

27

response is received, this action may be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of

28

Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.

1
2
3

The hearing date on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is vacated pending further order of
the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: April 17, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2