Bernstein v. Target Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
62
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PER PARTIES' SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 11/15/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
RYAN C. HESS (Cal. State Bar No. 263079)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
ryanhess@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Target Corporation
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN L. BERNSTEIN, IV,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
No. C13-1018-NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE PER PARTIES’
SETTLEMENT
TARGET STORES, INC., a corporation,
JOHN DOE 1-50; MARY ROE 1-50; XYZ
CORP 1-50; ABC LLC 1-50; the names of the
“John Doe 1-50,” “Mary Roe 1-50,” “XYZ
Corp. 1-50,” and “ABC LLC 1-50”
defendants being fictitious, and unknown to
the Plaintiff,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 76865374.1
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C13-1018 NC
3
4
5
checks pursuant to the parties’ Settlement Agreement (see ECF 61), and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
15
Dated: November ___, 2013.
S
RT
U
O
6
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
UNIT
ED
________________________________________
Hon. Nathanael Cousins
United ANTED
States Magistrate Judge
7
8
GR
9
NO
RT
ER
12
13
M. Cousin
s
A
H
11
thanael
Judge Na
LI
10
R NIA
2
Defendant Target Corporation having notified the Court that it has delivered the settlement
FO
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 76865374.1
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C13-1018 NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?