Bernstein v. Target Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PER PARTIES' SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 11/15/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) RYAN C. HESS (Cal. State Bar No. 263079) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com ryanhess@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Target Corporation 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN L. BERNSTEIN, IV, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 vs. No. C13-1018-NC [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PER PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT TARGET STORES, INC., a corporation, JOHN DOE 1-50; MARY ROE 1-50; XYZ CORP 1-50; ABC LLC 1-50; the names of the “John Doe 1-50,” “Mary Roe 1-50,” “XYZ Corp. 1-50,” and “ABC LLC 1-50” defendants being fictitious, and unknown to the Plaintiff, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 76865374.1 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C13-1018 NC 3 4 5 checks pursuant to the parties’ Settlement Agreement (see ECF 61), and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 15 Dated: November ___, 2013. S RT U O 6 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA UNIT ED ________________________________________ Hon. Nathanael Cousins United ANTED States Magistrate Judge 7 8 GR 9 NO RT ER 12 13 M. Cousin s A H 11 thanael Judge Na LI 10 R NIA 2 Defendant Target Corporation having notified the Court that it has delivered the settlement FO 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL_US_W # 76865374.1 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C13-1018 NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?