Bell v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 18

ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 10/7/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

VINCENT BELL,

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 13-1023 SI (pr)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
S. F. SHERIFF'S DEPT.; et al.,

11

Defendants.
/

12
13

This pro se civil action was dismissed on May 6, 2013 because plaintiff had not paid the

14

filing fee or filed a completed and signed court-approved in forma pauperis application.

15

Plaintiff later wrote that he had mailed an in forma pauperis application that the court had not

16

received and requested permission to file another application. The court vacated the order of

17

dismissal, reopened the action and ordered plaintiff to file a completed and signed in forma

18

pauperis application no later than September 13, 2013. Docket # 11. At plaintiff’s request, a

19

new in forma pauperis application form was sent to him. See Docket # 12 and July 19, 2013

20

docket entry. Plaintiff did not file the required in forma pauperis application and the deadline

21

by which to do so has passed. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for

22

failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis application. The clerk shall

23

close the file.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2013

_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge