Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 107 Regarding Scheduling filed by Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust. Case Management Statement due by 11/26/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/4/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/29/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP SOLOMON B. CERA (State Bar No. 99467) THOMAS C. BRIGHT (State Bar No. 169713) 595 Market Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-2230 Fax: (415) 777-5189 Email: scera@gbcslaw.com Email: tbright@gbcslaw.com Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff the Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust 7 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 DENIS MULLIGAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:13-cv-01037-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY HSU, and ARTHUR A. KOCH, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 HAVERHILL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 3:13-CV-01566-EMC 21 Plaintiff, 22 23 v. 24 IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY HSU, and ARTHUR A. KOCH, 25 26 Defendants. 27 28 C OHEN M ILSTEIN S ELLERS & T OLL PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WASHINGTON STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING CASE NUMBER: 13-cv-01037 EMC 1 Lead Plaintiff Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust, by and through its 2 respective counsel (“Lead Plaintiff”), and Defendants Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, and 3 Arthur A. Koch, by and through their respective counsel, (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby 4 stipulate to the following: 5 6 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, a case management conference is currently set for October 16, 2014 and the parties’ case management statement is due on October 9, 2014 (Dkt. #105); WHEREAS, on September 22, 2014, the parties engaged in a mediation and agreed to a settlement-in-principle to resolve this action; WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Order is without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights, arguments, or defenses otherwise available to the parties to this action; and 11 WHEREAS, the parties believe that in order to avoid waste of judicial and the parties’ 12 resources, the case management conference and case management statement should be continued 13 until further order of the Court and the action should be stayed while the Court considers whether 14 to approve the proposed settlement. 15 16 17 NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows: 1. 18 19 continued until further order of the Court; 2. 20 21 The case management conference currently scheduled for October 16, 2014 is The deadline for the parties’ case management statement, currently set for October 9, 2014, is continued until further order of the Court; and 3. The deadlines contained in the May 29, 2014 Order are suspended until further 22 order of the Court and the case is stayed in all respects except as to proceedings 23 concerning the approval and implementation of the proposed settlement. 24 25 26 27 28 C OHEN M ILSTEIN S ELLERS & T OLL PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WASHINGTON 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING CASE NUMBER: 13-cv-01037 EMC 1 DATED: September 26, 2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Solomon B. Cera Solomon B. Cera By: Peter A. Wald Peter A. Wald Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff the Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705) Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505) 505 Montgomery St., Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 peter.wald@lw.com marcy.priedeman@lw.com COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC Steven J. Toll (admitted pro hac vice) Daniel S. Sommers (admitted pro hac vice) Joshua M. Kolsky (admitted pro hac vice) 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. West Tower, Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Fax: (202) 408-4699 Christopher Lometti (admitted pro hac vice) 88 Pine Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10005 Telephone: (212) 838-7797 Facsimile: (212) 838-7745 and Patrick E. Gibbs (Bar No. 183174) 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1008 Telephone: (650) 328-4600 Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 patrick.gibbs@lw.com Counsel for Defendants Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, and Arthur A. Koch, Counsel for Lead Plaintiff the Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING CASE NUMBER: 13-cv-01037 EMC RT C OHEN M ILSTEIN S ELLERS & T OLL PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW WASHINGTON 3 A H ER n M. Che FO NO dward Judge E R NIA DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO LI UNIT ED S RT U O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A further CMC is set for December 4, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC Statement shall be filed by November 26, 2014. S DISTRICT 9/29/14 DATED: TEM. Chen C Hon. Edward TA United States District Court Judge N D IS T IC T R OF C STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING CASE NUMBER: 13-cv-01037 EMC 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling. Pursuant to General Order No. 45, 4 Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, Solomon B. Cera, attest that concurrence in the filing of 5 this document has been obtained. 6 7 8 DATED: September 26, 2014 _ _ /s/ Solomon B. Cera___ Solomon B. Cera 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING CASE NUMBER: 13-cv-01037 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?