St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. American Safety Indemnity Company et al

Filing 173

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 171 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY filed by St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/10/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC A. Eric Aguilera (SBN 192390) Kimberly R. Arnal (SBN 200448) 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, California 92626 T: 714.384.6600 / F: 714.384.6601 eaguilera@aguileragroup.com karnal@aguileragroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 13-01082-EMC Hon. Edward M. Chen Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; [PROPOSED] ORDER v. AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation; ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation; ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a North Dakota corporation; FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Missouri corporation; GOLDEN BEAR INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation; LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation; MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE 1 CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., a Pennsylvania corporation; NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation; NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a New York corporation; PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, A RISK RETENTION GROUP, a District of Colombia corporation; SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation; UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation; and DOES 1-1000, inclusive. 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiff St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and 17 Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) have reached a settlement; 18 WHEREAS, Plaintiff St. Paul wishes to dismiss, with prejudice, its First 19 Amended Complaint against Defendant Zurich in the present action. 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN 21 Plaintiff St. Paul and Defendant Zurich, by and through their designated counsel, that 22 Zurich be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action 23 pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Both Plaintiff St. Paul and Defendant Zurich further agree to waive any claim 24 25 for costs they might have against each other associated with the present action. 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 DATED: July 9, 2015 2 SINNOTT PUEBLA CAMPAIGN & CURET, APLC 3 By: /s/ Randy M. Marmor (Auth. on 7/9/15) Randy M. Marmor Attorneys for Defendant, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: July 9, 2015 THE AGULIERA LAW GROUP, APLC 9 10 11 12 13 By: Kimberly R. Arnal A. ERIC AGUILERA KIMBERLY R. ARNAL Attorneys for Plaintiff, ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP 14 15 16 22 23 NO RT ER 26 27 A H 25 Chen LI 24 28 ard M. dw Judge E R NIA 21 RT U O 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. IST RIC SD TC July 10, 2015 TE A T DATED: _______________ _____________________________ Honorable Edward M. Chen DERED SO OR IT IS FO 19 S 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER UNIT ED 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 3 CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 444 S. Flower St., Ste. 2300, Los Angeles, California 90071. On July 9, 2014, I served the documents named below on the parties in this action as follows: DOCUMENT(S) SERVED: STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 BY U.S. MAIL *I deposited such envelope in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under the practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA ECF I transmitted a true copy of the above entitled document(s) to CM/ECF for filing and service on all parties. (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. 19 20 Executed on July 9, 2015 at Los Angeles, California. 21 22 ____ /s/ Judy Jaramillo _______________ Judy Jaramillo 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?