St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. American Safety Indemnity Company et al
Filing
178
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 177 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK filed by St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/19/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
A. Eric Aguilera (SBN 192390)
Kimberly R. Arnal (SBN 200448)
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, California 92626
T: 714.384.6600 / F: 714.384.6601
eaguilera@aguileragroup.com
karnal@aguileragroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 13-01082-EMC
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY
DISMISS DEFENDANT
NORTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY OF NEW YORK;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY
COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation;
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation;
ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a North Dakota
corporation; FIRST SPECIALTY
INSURANCE CORPORATION, a
Missouri corporation; GOLDEN BEAR
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
California corporation; HARTFORD
CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation;
LANDMARK AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, an
Oklahoma corporation; LEXINGTON
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation; LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Massachusetts corporation;
MARYLAND CASUALTY
COMPANY, a Maryland corporation;
MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE
1
CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation;
NATIONAL UNION FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF
PITTSBURGH, PA., a Pennsylvania
corporation; NAUTILUS
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona
corporation; NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW
YORK, a New York corporation;
PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, A
RISK RETENTION GROUP, a District
of Colombia corporation;
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Ohio corporation;
UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Pennsylvania
corporation; ZURICH AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, a New
York corporation; and DOES 1-1000,
inclusive.
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiff St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and
17
Defendant Northern Insurance Company of New York (“Northern”) have reached a
18
settlement;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff St. Paul wishes to dismiss, with prejudice, its First
19
20
Amended Complaint against Defendant Northern in the present action.
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN
22
Plaintiff St. Paul and Defendant Northern, by and through their designated counsel,
23
that Northern Insurance Company of New York be and is hereby dismissed with
24
prejudice from the above-entitled action pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).
Both Plaintiff St. Paul and Defendant Northern further agree to waive any
25
26
claim for costs they might have against each other associated with the present action.
27
///
28
2
CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
1
DATED: August 19, 2015
2
SINNOTT PUEBLA CAMPAIGN & CURET,
APLC
By:
/s/ Randy M. Marmor (Auth. on 8/19/15)
Randy M. Marmor
Attorneys for Defendant,
NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NEW YORK
3
4
5
6
7
8
DATED: August 19, 2015
9
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
By:
/s/ Kimberly R. Arnal
A. Eric Aguilera
Kimberly R. Arnal
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
COMPANY
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
RT
25
27
28
dwa
Judge E
ER
H
26
hen
rd M. C
NO
24
R NIA
23
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
FO
22
LI
UNIT
ED
S
21
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
_____________________________
TE
C
Honorable Edward M. Chen
TA
8/19/15
DATED: _______________
A
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
3
CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age
of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 444 S. Flower St.,
Ste. 2300, Los Angeles, California 90071. On August 19, 2015, I served the
documents named below on the parties in this action as follows:
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED:
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS
DEFENDANT NORTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY OF NEW YORK; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BY U.S. MAIL
*I deposited such envelope in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The envelope
was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under the practice it would be deposited with
U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los
Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of
the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage
date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA ECF I transmitted a true copy of the above
entitled document(s) to CM/ECF for filing and service on all parties.
(State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the above is true and correct.
(Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
court at whose direction the service was made.
19
20
Executed on August 19, 2015 at Los Angeles, California.
21
22
____ /s/ Judy Jaramillo _______________
Judy Jaramillo
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
CASE NO. C-13-01082-EMC
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?