Daniel et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 47

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT. The date by which defendants must respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint is extended from January 22, 2014 to February 21, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 22, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876
Arlene Helfrich, State Bar No. 096461
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
The Waterfront Building
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS
DEVANY DEE, RICK SMITH, and STEVE BIAS

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEBRON DANIEL, LILAY, INC. and PEARL
MICHELLE MOYA,

12

Plaintiffs,

13

v.

14

CITY OF ANTIOCH, a Municipal Corporation,
ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS DEVANY
DEE, Individually, RICK SMITH, Individually,
and STEVE BIAS, Individually, and DOES 1
through 30, Jointly and Severally,

15
16
17

Case No. CV 13-01084-MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Defendants.

18
19

Plaintiffs LILAY INC., KEBRON DANIEL, and PEARL MICHELLE MOYA filed their Fourth

20

Amended Complaint on January 8, 2014. (Docket No. 45). The parties agree and hereby stipulate to

21

extend the time within which defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS

22

DEVANY DEE, RICK SMITH, and STEVE BIAS must respond to this Fourth Amended Complaint

23

from January 22, 2014 to February 21, 2014.

24

Good cause for this extension exists in that the parties have been discussing settlement of this

25

action and are scheduled to attend a Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero on

26

February 3, 2014. The parties wish to direct their attentions toward preparation for that settlement

27

conference and negotiations for settlement. The undersigned counsel therefore respectfully request that

28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT - US District Court Case No. 3:13-cv-01084-MMC

1

this Court extend defendants’ time to respond to the Fourth Amended Complaint from January 22, 2014

2

to February 21, 2014.

3
4

SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 22, 2014

5

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
By:

6
7
8
9
10

Dated: January 21, 2014

11

13
14

ATTESTATION

15

17
18

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
By: /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt
Sanjay S. Schmidt
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LILAY INC., KEBRON DANIEL, and PEARL
MICHELLE MOYA

12

16

/s/ Gregory M. Fox
Gregory M. Fox
Arlene Helfrich
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH POLICE
OFFICERS DEVANY DEE, RICK SMITH, and
STEVE BIAS

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures/electronic consent by all counsel for any
signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: January 22, 2014

19

/s/ Gregory M. Fox
Gregory M. Fox
ORDER

20
21
22
23
24
25

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the date by which defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH POLICE
OFFICERS DEVANY DEE, RICK SMITH, and STEVE BIAS must respond to the Fourth Amended
Complaint be extended from January 22, 2014 to February 21, 2014.
SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated: January 22, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSE DATE TO FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT - US District Court Case No. 3:13-cv-01084-MMC