Daniel et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
49
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, it is ordered that plaintiffs' claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, tha t if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 4, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
No. C 13-1084 MMC
KEBRON DANIEL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cause,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims alleged against defendants herein
be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to
this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on the opposing
party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the
foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the
calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 4, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?