Daniel et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 49

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, it is ordered that plaintiffs' claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, tha t if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 4, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 No. C 13-1084 MMC KEBRON DANIEL, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?