Daniel et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 51

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 14, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Sanjay S. Schmidt SBN 247475 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 1686 Second St., Suite 219 Livermore, California 94550 Ofc. Phone: (925) 215-7733 Facsimile: (925) 455-2486 e-mail: sanjay.schmidt@gmail.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Joseph S. May SBN 245924 LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY 744 Montgomery Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 781-3333 Facsimile: (415) 398-1410 e-mail: joseph@josephmaylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs LILAY INC., KEBRON DANIEL, and PEARL MICHELLE MOYA Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 Arlene Helfrich, State Bar No. 096461 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 E-mail: gfox@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS DEVANY DEE, RICK SMITH, and STEVE BIAS 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEBRON DANIEL, LILAY INC., and PEARL MICHELLE MOYA Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF ANTIOCH, a municipal corporation, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 13-01084 MMC ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Action Filed: March 8, 2013 Trial Date: November 3, 2014 1 STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: CASE NO. CV-13-01084 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Parties to this action have reached a settlement, as noted by the Court on February 4, 2014 in its conditional order dismissing this matter without prejudice (Dkt. No. 49). The terms and conditions of the settlement having been fully satisfied, with the agreed upon consideration for the settlement having been delivered, the Parties now hereby stipulate to an Order dismissing the entire action with prejudice, all Parties to bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees. Dated: April 11, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT and LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY 8 9 10 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt* By: SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 Dated: April 11, 2014 14 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 15 /s/ Gregory M. Fox By: GREGORY M. FOX Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 *Pursuant to General Order 45, §X.B., the filer of this document attests that he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Respectfully Submitted, ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the matter be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, all Parties to bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: _________________ April 14, 2014 ______________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court Judge 2 STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: CASE NO. CV-13-01084 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?