Waves Audio Ltd et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al
Filing
47
ORDER granting 46 MOTION Change Deadlines. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/11/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
J. Scott Denko, pro hac vice
Texas State Bar No. 00792457
Bradley D. Coburn, pro hac vice
Texas State Bar No. 24036377
Sherri A. Wilson, pro hac vice
Texas State Bar No. 24075291
DENKO COBURN LAUFF LLP
3811 Bee Cave Road; Ste. 204
Austin, Texas 78746
Tel: 512-906-2074
Fax: 512-906-2075
denko@dcllegal.com
coburn@dcllegal.com
wilson@dcllegal.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Perry R. Clark
California Bar No. 197101
LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK
825 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Tel: 650-248-5817
Fax: 650-618-8533
perry@perryclarklaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs
WAVES AUDIO LTD. AND WAVES INC.
16
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
WAVES AUDIO LTD. AND WAVES INC.,
Plaintiffs
v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC AND
MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS LLC,
Defendants.
25
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01091-WHO
CIVIL L.R. 7-11 MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR
RELIEF FROM CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND
FOR AMENDED CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 16-2(D)
26
27
28
MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO
PAGE 1
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, the parties to this action file this miscellaneous
2
administrative request for relief from the current case management schedule and to jointly
3
request the modification of certain deadlines in the case management schedule pursuant to Civil
4
L.R. 16-2(b).
5
6
7
8
9
On December 3, 2013, the Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order (Doc. 40, attached as Ex.
A) that adopted the parties’ proposed schedule for this case.
The parties now respectfully request that the Court change the following deadlines set
in the Civil Pretrial Order (Doc. 40):
11
Expert disclosure from July 18, 2014 to July 25, 2014
Discovery cutoff from August 15, 2014 to August 22, 2014
Expert rebuttal from August 15, 2014 to August 22, 2014
Expert discovery cutoff from September 12, 2014 to September 19, 2014
12
None of the other deadlines in this case would be changed by this requested modification.
10
13
Dated: June 11, 2014
14
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
/s/ Perry Clark
J. Scott Denko (pro hac vice)
(Texas State Bar No. 00792457)
Bradley D. Coburn (pro hac vice)
(Texas State Bar No. 24036377)
Sherri A Wilson (pro hac vice)
(Texas State Bar No. 24075291)
DENKO COBURN LAUFF LLP
3811 Bee Cave Road, Suite 204
Austin, TX 78746
Telephone: (512) 906-2074
Facsimile: (512) 906-2075
Email: denko@dcllegal.com
coburn@dcllegal.com
wilson@dcllegal.com
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Perry R. Clark (California Bar No. 197101)
LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK
825 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 248-5817
Facsimile: (650) 618-8533
Email: perry@perryclarklaw.com
24
25
26
27
28
MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO
PAGE 2
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
1
/s/ Thomas M. Williams
THOMAS M. WILLIAMS (pro hac vice)
tmwilliams@ulmer.com
ULMER & BERNE LLP
500 West Madison St., Ste. 3600
Chicago, IL 60661-4587
Telephone:
(312) 658-6500
Facsimile:
(312) 658-6557
2
3
4
5
6
DAVID P. ENZMINGER (SBN: 137065)
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
denzminger@winston.com
333 South Grand Ave., 38th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
(213) 615-1700
Facsimile:
(213) 615-1750
K. JOON OH (SBN: 246142)
koh@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Telephone:
(415) 591-1000
Facsimile:
(415) 591-1400
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: __________________
June 11, 2014
17
__________________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES
CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO
PAGE 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?