Waves Audio Ltd et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 46 MOTION Change Deadlines. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/11/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 J. Scott Denko, pro hac vice Texas State Bar No. 00792457 Bradley D. Coburn, pro hac vice Texas State Bar No. 24036377 Sherri A. Wilson, pro hac vice Texas State Bar No. 24075291 DENKO COBURN LAUFF LLP 3811 Bee Cave Road; Ste. 204 Austin, Texas 78746 Tel: 512-906-2074 Fax: 512-906-2075 denko@dcllegal.com coburn@dcllegal.com wilson@dcllegal.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Perry R. Clark California Bar No. 197101 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK 825 San Antonio Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel: 650-248-5817 Fax: 650-618-8533 perry@perryclarklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs WAVES AUDIO LTD. AND WAVES INC. 16 Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 WAVES AUDIO LTD. AND WAVES INC., Plaintiffs v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC AND MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS LLC, Defendants. 25 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01091-WHO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND FOR AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 16-2(D) 26 27 28 MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO PAGE 1 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, the parties to this action file this miscellaneous 2 administrative request for relief from the current case management schedule and to jointly 3 request the modification of certain deadlines in the case management schedule pursuant to Civil 4 L.R. 16-2(b). 5 6 7 8 9 On December 3, 2013, the Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order (Doc. 40, attached as Ex. A) that adopted the parties’ proposed schedule for this case. The parties now respectfully request that the Court change the following deadlines set in the Civil Pretrial Order (Doc. 40): 11 Expert disclosure from July 18, 2014 to July 25, 2014 Discovery cutoff from August 15, 2014 to August 22, 2014 Expert rebuttal from August 15, 2014 to August 22, 2014 Expert discovery cutoff from September 12, 2014 to September 19, 2014 12 None of the other deadlines in this case would be changed by this requested modification. 10 13 Dated: June 11, 2014 14 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS /s/ Perry Clark J. Scott Denko (pro hac vice) (Texas State Bar No. 00792457) Bradley D. Coburn (pro hac vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24036377) Sherri A Wilson (pro hac vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24075291) DENKO COBURN LAUFF LLP 3811 Bee Cave Road, Suite 204 Austin, TX 78746 Telephone: (512) 906-2074 Facsimile: (512) 906-2075 Email: denko@dcllegal.com coburn@dcllegal.com wilson@dcllegal.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Perry R. Clark (California Bar No. 197101) LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK 825 San Antonio Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 248-5817 Facsimile: (650) 618-8533 Email: perry@perryclarklaw.com 24 25 26 27 28 MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO PAGE 2 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 1 /s/ Thomas M. Williams THOMAS M. WILLIAMS (pro hac vice) tmwilliams@ulmer.com ULMER & BERNE LLP 500 West Madison St., Ste. 3600 Chicago, IL 60661-4587 Telephone: (312) 658-6500 Facsimile: (312) 658-6557 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID P. ENZMINGER (SBN: 137065) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP denzminger@winston.com 333 South Grand Ave., 38th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 615-1700 Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 K. JOON OH (SBN: 246142) koh@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: __________________ June 11, 2014 17 __________________________________ Hon. William H. Orrick United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MISC. ADMIN. REQ. TO EXTEND DEADLINES CASE NO.: 3:13-CV-01091-WHO PAGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?