Uribe v. Babienco et al
Filing
114
ORDER REGARDING DISPUTED FACTS AS TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/26/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CESAR URIBE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REGARDING DISPUTED
FACTS AS TO QUALIFIED
IMMUNITY
PHILIP BABIENCO,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 13-01106 WHA
If either party feels that there is a disputed fact question that should be answered by the
17
jury on a special interrogatory to aid the Court in determining whether defendant is entitled to
18
qualified immunity, the party should submit any such factual issue to the Court in writing by
19
11:00 P.M. TONIGHT.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 26, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?