Uribe v. Babienco et al

Filing 114

ORDER REGARDING DISPUTED FACTS AS TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/26/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CESAR URIBE, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING DISPUTED FACTS AS TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY PHILIP BABIENCO, Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 13-01106 WHA If either party feels that there is a disputed fact question that should be answered by the 17 jury on a special interrogatory to aid the Court in determining whether defendant is entitled to 18 qualified immunity, the party should submit any such factual issue to the Court in writing by 19 11:00 P.M. TONIGHT. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 26, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?