Rankin v. Global Tel*Link Corporation

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING re 35 Stipulation To Confirm that No Responsive Pleading is Due Before Filing of Second Amended Complaint and to 30-day Response Deadline Therefrom filed by Global Tel*Link Corporation. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/25/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2013)

1

2
J

4
5

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Jordan D. Grotzinger (SBN 190166)
gr ofzingerj@ gtl aw. c o m
Robert J. Henington (SBN 2344T1)
herrin gtonr@ gtlaw. com
1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, California 90067

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 3 1 0.5 86.7800

6
7
8

9

Vera Ranieri (SBN 271594)
[e-mail]
4Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 9411 1 -5983
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.7 07 .2010

10

Attorneys
11

for

D

efendant

GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION

I2
13

LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

t4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DiVISION

r6

I7
18

CORRIN RANKIN D/B/A OUT NOW
BAIL BONDS,

19

Plaintiff,

20

V.

2l

GLOBAL TEL* LINK CORPORATION,

Case

No. C 13-01117 JCS

STIPULATION TO CONFIRM THAT NO
RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS DUE BEFORE
FILING OF SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND TO 3O-DAY RESPONSE
DEADLINE THEREFROM

22
Defendant.
23

[L.R.6-1(a)]

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDBD COMPLAINT
l-

On July 9,2013,the Court granted the motion of Defendant Global Tel*Link Corporation

I
2

("GTL") to dismiss Plaintifls First Amended Complaint, except with respect to Plaintiffls second

J

claim for breach of implied contract. The Coutt's order provides that PlaintifTs Second Amended

4

Complaint ("SAC") shall be filed by August 31,2013. (EFC No. 33.) Plaintiffls counsel plans to file

5

a

6

implied contract before the filing of the SAC, and that GTL shall have 30 days from the filing of the

7

SAC within which to move or otherwise respond to the SAC. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this

8

stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already f,rxed by Court order. Should

9

the Court so desire, the parties

10

SAC. Accordingly, the par-ties have agreed that GTL need not respond to the claim for breach of

will submit an additional stipulation

and Declaration pursuant to Local

Rule 6-2 (which Declaration will essentially recite the above facts).

11

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

t2 Dated: July 23,2013
13

By /s/ Jordan D. Gro nçrer
Jordan D. Grotzinger
At t o rney s .fo r D efe ndant
GLOBAL TELXLINK CORPORATION

t4
15
T6

I7
18

GLAZNER & RYAN

Dated: JuIy 23,2013

T9

Dated: 7/25/13

RT

24

Judge Jo

ER

seph C.

Spero

A

H

25

ERED

R NIA

NO

23

O ORD
IT IS S

Rvnn
Maureen Pettibone Ryan
At t o r n ey s fo r P I aint iff
CORRIN RANKIN D/B/A OUT NOW BAIL
BONDS

FO

22

By /s/ Maureen Petti

LI

UNIT
ED

21

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
-2-