Rankin v. Global Tel*Link Corporation

Filing 7

ORDER GRANTING re 6 Stipulation to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline by Eight Days filed by Global Tel*Link Corporation. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/2/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2013)

1 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Jordan D. Gretzinger (SBN 190 166)
2 [e-mail]
Robert J. Herrington (SBN 234417)
3
herringtonr@gtlaw .com
4 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, California 90067
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310.586.7800
6

J. Blake Cunningham (SBN 261559)
[e-mail]
8 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94111-5983
9 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.707.2010
10
Attorneys for Defendant
11 GLOBAL TEL *LINK CORPORATION
7

12

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

I7
18 CORRIN RANKIN DIBIA OUT NOW
BAIL BONDS,
19
20

Case No. C 13-01117 JCS

Plain£iff,
V.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE
PLEADING DEADLINE BY EIGHT DAYS

21

GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
22 AND DOES I-50,
23

jL.R. 6-l(a)]

Defendants.

24 1~--------------------------~
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
-I-

Defendant Global Tel*Link Corporation ("Defendant") removed this action to this Court on
2 March 12, 2013. Pursuant to a stipulation filed in this action in state court and attached to the Notice
3

of Removal, Defendant has up to and including March 28, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to the

4 Complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 6- l(a), the parties hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an

5 additional eight days, up to and including April 5, 2013, in which to answer or otherwise respond to
6 the Complaint. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by
7

Court order.

8
9

Dated: March 26, 2013

10

11
12

13
14

15 Dated: March 26, 2013

GLAZNER & RYAN

16

18

I

23

LI

ER

A

H

27

RT

26

NO

25

ero

h C. Sp

sep
Judge Jo

FO

22 Dated: 4/2/13

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

R NIA

S

21

UNIT
ED

20

Maureen Pettibone Ryan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DISTRICCORRIN RANKlN D!BIA OUT NOW BAIL
T C DS
BON

RT
U
O

ES
AT
T

19

24

~h v{J~);fv_

By:

17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
-2-

1

2

PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3

I am employed in the aforesaid county, State of California; I am over the age of 18
4 years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1840 Century Park
East, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, California 90067.
5

On March 27, 2013, I served the documents described as:

6

7

STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BY
EIGHT DAYS [L.R. 6-l(a))

8
9

on the following interested parties in this action addressed as follows:

10

Maureen Petibone Ryan
11 GLAZNER&RYAN
12 333 Bradford Street, Suite 190
Redwood City, CA 94063
13 [e-mail]
14
15

D

17
18

20
21

(BY E-MAIL)
On March 27, 2013, I transmitted the foregoing document(s) by E-mail to the
parties at their respective e-mail addresses as indicated above. The document was
served electronically and the transmission was reported complete and without
error.

16

19

J. Blake Cunningham
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111 -5983
[e-mail]

D

(BYCMJECF)
Pursuant to CMIECF System, registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes service
through the Court's transmission facilities. The Court's CM/ECF system sends an
e-mail notification of the filing to the parties and counsel of record listed above
who are registered with the Court's EC/ECF system.

22
23

24
25

26

D (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS)

I am readily familiar with the business practice of my
place of employment in respect to the collection and processing of correspondence,
pleadings and notices for delivery by Federal Express. Under the practice it would
be deposited with Federal Express on that same day with postage thereon fully
prepared at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware
that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if delivery by Federal
Express is more than one day after date of deposit with Federal Express.

27
28

PROOF OF SERVICE
LA 130,293,031v 5-27- 12

1

D

2
3

4
5
6
7
8
9

D

(BY MAIL)
D I deposited such envelope in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The envelope
was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
D I am readily familiar with the business practice of my place of employment in
respect to the collection and processing of correspondence, pleadings and
notices for mailing with United States Postal Service. The foregoing sealed
envelope was placed for collection and mailing this date consistent with the
ordinary business practice of my place of employment, so that it will be picked
up this date with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California, in
the ordinary course of such business.
(STATE)
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the foregoing is true and correct.

10

(FEDERAL) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
11 ~
correct, and that I am employed at the office of a member of the bar of this Court
at whose direction the service was made.
12
13
14

Executed on March 27, 2013, at Los Angeles, California.

15
16
17
18
19

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PROOF OF SERVICE
LA 130,293,031v 5-27-12