Saleh v. Bush et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Enlargement of Briefing Deadlines filed by Richard B. Cheney, Paul M. Wolfowitz, Condoleezza Rice, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Colin L. Powell, George W. Bush. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 18, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

STUART F. DELERY
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director, Torts Branch, Civil Division
MARY HAMPTON MASON
Senior Trial Counsel
GLENN S. GREENE
Senior Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
Constitutional and Specialized Tort Litigation
P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
[phone] (phone)
[phone] (fax)
[e-mail]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY,
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, COLIN POWELL,
DONALD RUMSFELD, AND PAUL WOLFOWITZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SUNDUS SHAKER SALEH, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
GEORGE W. BUSH, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________ )

No. 3:13-cv-01124 JST
PROPOSED ORDER:
STIPULATED REQUEST
FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING
BRIEFING DEADLINES

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST
PROPOSED ORDER:
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES

1
2
3
4

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED:
a. On or before November 29, 2013, the Defendants will file a dispositive
motion addressing the Amended Complaint. Pursuant to the previous
stipulation and order, the length of the Defendants’ motion shall not exceed

5
6
7

forty (40) pages of text.
b. On or before January 29, 2014, Plaintiff will respond to the Defendants’

8

dispositive motion. Pursuant to the previous stipulation and order, the length

9

of Plaintiff’s response shall not exceed forty (40) pages of text.

10

c. The Defendants will have until February 28, 2014, to reply to Plaintiff’s

11
opposition. Pursuant to the previous stipulation and order, the length of the
12
13

Defendants’ reply shall not exceed twenty (20) pages of text.

14

d. Pursuant to the previous stipulation and order, in the event that Plaintiff seeks

15

to challenge any certification of the Defendants in this action made by the

16

United States Department of Justice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1) in

17
18
19
20

response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint, Plaintiff may challenge such
certification within the body of her response to the Defendants’ dispositive
motion, in lieu of a separate pleading (such as a motion to strike).

21
22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

25

______________________________
Judge Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California

26

Dated: October 18, 2013

24

27
28

2

NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST
PROPOSED ORDER:
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES