Saleh v. Bush et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 38 MOTION for Hearing pursuant to Osborn v. Haley in support of Second Amended Complaint filed by Richard B. Cheney, Paul M. Wolfowitz, Condoleezza Rice, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Colin L. Powell, George W. Bush. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 20, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 STUART F. DELERY Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director, Torts Branch, Civil Division MARY HAMPTON MASON Senior Trial Counsel GLENN S. GREENE Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Constitutional and Specialized Tort Litigation P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 616-4143 (phone) (202) 616-4314 (fax) Glenn.Greene@usdoj.gov ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, COLIN POWELL, DONALD RUMSFELD, AND PAUL WOLFOWITZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SUNDUS SHAKER SALEH, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) No. 3:13-cv-01124 JST PROPOSED ORDER: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST ORDER STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED: 1 2  3 4 5 On or before July 7, 2014, the Defendants will file a response to Plaintiff Saleh’s Osborn Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in Support of Second Amended Complaint.  The August 27, 2014, hearing date is vacated. 6 8 ______________________________ Judge Jon S. Tigar United States District Court for the Northern District of California 9 Dated: June 20, 2014 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST ORDER STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?