Saleh v. Bush et al
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 38 MOTION for Hearing pursuant to Osborn v. Haley in support of Second Amended Complaint filed by Richard B. Cheney, Paul M. Wolfowitz, Condoleezza Rice, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Colin L. Powell, George W. Bush. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 20, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director, Torts Branch, Civil Division
MARY HAMPTON MASON
Senior Trial Counsel
GLENN S. GREENE
Senior Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
Constitutional and Specialized Tort Litigation
P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
(202) 616-4143 (phone)
(202) 616-4314 (fax)
Glenn.Greene@usdoj.gov
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY,
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, COLIN POWELL,
DONALD RUMSFELD, AND PAUL WOLFOWITZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SUNDUS SHAKER SALEH, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
GEORGE W. BUSH, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________ )
No. 3:13-cv-01124 JST
PROPOSED ORDER:
STIPULATED REQUEST
FOR AN ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING
DEADLINES
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST
ORDER
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED:
1
2
3
4
5
On or before July 7, 2014, the Defendants will file a response to Plaintiff Saleh’s Osborn
Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in Support of Second Amended Complaint.
The August 27, 2014, hearing date is vacated.
6
8
______________________________
Judge Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California
9
Dated: June 20, 2014
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NO. 3:13-CV-01124 JST
ORDER
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER
ENLARGING BRIEFING DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?