Lawson v. Chabrowski

Filing 26

NOTICE RE RECENT FILINGS BY DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/14/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 COURTNEY LAWSON, No. C 13-01130 WHA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. Defendant. / 15 16 NOTICE RE RECENT FILINGS BY DEFENDANT DARIUS (DEREK) CHABROWSKI, Plaintiff timely filed a motion to remand this action on March 21, 2013 (Dkt. No. 3). 17 Defendant failed to respond. Defendant was ordered to show cause by April 23 why the action 18 should not be remanded, and failed to respond (Dkt. No. 19). He was given until April 30 to 19 answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, which he also failed to do (ibid.). By order dated 20 May 2, this action was remanded to the Superior Court for the County of San Mateo (Dkt. 21 No. 20). That order found that defendant improperly removed this action. Defendant was given 22 ample notice of the motion to remand and was provided lenience regarding due dates to respond, 23 but chose not to do so. 24 After the order remanding this action was entered, defendant filed a motion to strike 25 plaintiff’s motion to remand, a motion for a “more definitive statement,” a motion to 26 consolidate the case with Chabrowski v. Lawson, No. C 12-6339 (which has been dismissed 27 by Judge Richard Seeborg), and a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6) 28 (Dkt. Nos. 22–24). The May 2 order divested this Court of jurisdiction over this matter. 1 Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of Cal., 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir. 1988). 2 Defendant’s recently filed motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 3 Defendant is on notice that no further filings are to be made with this Court. 4 Defendant should proceed to litigate the merits of this action in the Superior Court for the 5 County of San Mateo. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Dated: May 14, 2013. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?