Heatherly et al v. Bistro 29 et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN. Plaintiffs must either satisfy Rule 15(a)(2)or show cause in writing why second amended complaint should not be stricken within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/23/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNI
ITED STAT DISTR
TES
RICT COU
URT

8

NORTH
HERN DIS
STRICT O CALIFO
OF
ORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO D
DIVISION
N

10
0
11 DAREN HEATHE
1
N
ERLY, et al.,

-cv-01132 N
NC
C ase No. 13-

12
2

O
ORDER TO SHOW C
O
CAUSE WH
HY
PL
LAINTIFF SECON AMEN
FS’
ND
NDED
C OMPLAIN SHOUL NOT B
NT
LD
BE
TRICKEN
N
ST

Plaintiffs,

13
3

v.

14 BISTRO 29, et al.,
4
O

Re:
R Dkt. No. 9

15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5

Defendants.
D
Ru 15 of th Federal Rules of Civ Procedur provides that a party may amen its
ule
he
R
vil
re
s
y
nd
pleading once as a matter of co
g
ourse. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). “ all other cases, a party
“In
r
may amend its plea
ading only with the opp
w
posing party written consent or the court’s
y’s
leave.” Fed. R. Civ P. 15(a)(2 On May 22, 2013, plaintiffs f
v.
2).
y
filed a Seco Amende
ond
ed
Complaint, Dkt. No 9. Plaint
o.
tiffs have no sought le
ot
eave of Cou for this s
urt
second
amendm
ment, and it is unclear whether def
w
fendants hav consente to the am
ve
ed
mendment.
Accordingly, within 14 days of the date of this order plaintiffs must either satisfy Ru
n
o
o
r,
r
ule
15(a)(2) or show ca
)
ause in writ
ting why the Second A
e
Amended Co
omplaint sh
hould not be
e
stricken.
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.

26
6
27
7

Date: May 23 2013
3,

28
8
Case No. 13-cv-0113 NC
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
R

____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge