Heatherly et al v. Bistro 29 et al
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 35 ; ORDER CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 9/3/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNI
ITED STAT DISTR
TES
RICT COU
URT
5
NORTH
HERN DIS
STRICT O CALIFO
OF
ORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO D
DIVISION
N
7
8 DAREN HEATHE
N
ERLY, IRM RAMIR
MA
REZ,
Case No. 13-cv-01132 N
NC
9
O
ORDER GR
RANTING PLAINTIF
FFS’
M
MOTION F
FOR LEAV TO FIL
VE
LE
TH
HIRD AM
MENDED C
COMPLAIN
NT;
an ORDER CONTIN
nd
R
NUING CA
ASE
M
MANAGEM
MENT CON
NFERENC TO
CE
SE
EPTEMBE 3
ER
10
0
Plaintiffs,
v.
11 BISTRO 29, and ot
1
O
thers,
12
2
Defendants.
D
Re:
R Dkt. No. 35
13
3
14
4
Un
nder Federa Rule of Civil Proced
al
C
dure 15, lea to amen shall be f
ave
nd
freely given when
n
n
p
eek
nd
mplaint to ad an allega
dd
ation of
15 justice requires. In this case, plaintiffs se to amen their com
5
mplaint reta
aliation. Th Court fin that the proposed a
he
nds
amendment would not
16 post-com
6
ce
nts,
ntimely, and is not futi or frivolo
d
ile
ous. Signif
ficantly,
17 prejudic defendan is not un
7
nts
bout
w
ns
st
ccordingly, the motion for
,
n
18 defendan knew ab the new allegation in Augus 2013. Ac
8
D.
t
d
proposed T
Third Amen
nded
19 leave is GRANTED The Clerk of Court is directed to file the p
9
d
20 Complaint, docket entry 37-1, this same day.
0
21
1
In addition, plaintiffs’ re
n
p
equest to co
ontinue the case manag
gement con
nference to
ber
,
ANTED, for good cause shown. A other case
r
e
All
22 Septemb 3, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. is GRA
2
es
nchanged.
23 deadline remain un
3
24
4
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
25
5
Date: August 4, 2014
t
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No. 13-cv-0113 NC
32
G
T
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
A
D
INT
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAI
_____
__________
__________
____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?