Heatherly et al v. Bistro 29 et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 35 ; ORDER CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 9/3/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNI ITED STAT DISTR TES RICT COU URT 5 NORTH HERN DIS STRICT O CALIFO OF ORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO D DIVISION N 7 8 DAREN HEATHE N ERLY, IRM RAMIR MA REZ, Case No. 13-cv-01132 N NC 9 O ORDER GR RANTING PLAINTIF FFS’ M MOTION F FOR LEAV TO FIL VE LE TH HIRD AM MENDED C COMPLAIN NT; an ORDER CONTIN nd R NUING CA ASE M MANAGEM MENT CON NFERENC TO CE SE EPTEMBE 3 ER 10 0 Plaintiffs, v. 11 BISTRO 29, and ot 1 O thers, 12 2 Defendants. D Re: R Dkt. No. 35 13 3 14 4 Un nder Federa Rule of Civil Proced al C dure 15, lea to amen shall be f ave nd freely given when n n p eek nd mplaint to ad an allega dd ation of 15 justice requires. In this case, plaintiffs se to amen their com 5 mplaint reta aliation. Th Court fin that the proposed a he nds amendment would not 16 post-com 6 ce nts, ntimely, and is not futi or frivolo d ile ous. Signif ficantly, 17 prejudic defendan is not un 7 nts bout w ns st ccordingly, the motion for , n 18 defendan knew ab the new allegation in Augus 2013. Ac 8 D. t d proposed T Third Amen nded 19 leave is GRANTED The Clerk of Court is directed to file the p 9 d 20 Complaint, docket entry 37-1, this same day. 0 21 1 In addition, plaintiffs’ re n p equest to co ontinue the case manag gement con nference to ber , ANTED, for good cause shown. A other case r e All 22 Septemb 3, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. is GRA 2 es nchanged. 23 deadline remain un 3 24 4 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 25 5 Date: August 4, 2014 t 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No. 13-cv-0113 NC 32 G T ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A D INT THIRD AMENDED COMPLAI _____ __________ __________ ____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?