Gilbert v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING 15 STIPULATION CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/24/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6

Sean A. Commons, SBN 217603
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Defendant
Bank of America, N.A.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

12

SEAN L. GILBERT, on behalf of
himself and all persons similarly
situated,

13

Plaintiff,

11

14

v.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

Case No. 3:13-cv-01171-JSW
Assigned to: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

STIPULATION

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page2 of 6

1

Defendant Bank of America, N.A., through its counsel, Defendants Aaron

2

Shoaf, Effective Marketing Solutions, LLC, MoneyMutual, LLC, London Bay

3

Capital, LLC, Selling Source, LLC, Montel Williams, and Glenn McKay, through

4

their counsel, and Plaintiff Sean L. Gilbert, through his counsel, hereby stipulate as

5

follows:

6

WHEREAS:

7

A.

Plaintiff intends to a file a motion to remand this action to the Superior

8

Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Alameda (hereafter, the

9

“Alameda Superior Court”), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;

10

B.

Defendants presently intend to oppose that motion;

11

C.

The current deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint by way

12
13

of an answer, motion, or otherwise is April 30, 2013;
D.

The parties agree that any responses by Defendants to the Complaint

14

should be postponed until twenty (20) days after a ruling denying a motion to remand

15

or, in the event this action is remanded, after re-docketing of the action in the

16

Alameda Superior Court, subject to order of either this Court or the Alameda

17

Superior Court;

18

E.

Defendants enter into this stipulation without waiving any procedural or

19

substantive defenses not previously waived, including (if applicable) their ability to

20

challenge service of process and personal jurisdiction; and

21
22

F.

Plaintiff enters into this stipulation while expressly reserving his right to

oppose any motions filed by Defendants in response to the Complaint.

23

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED,

24

AND STIPULATED by all parties that Defendants’ responses to the Complaint, by

25

way of answer or otherwise, shall be postponed until twenty (20) days after a ruling

26

denying a motion to remand or, in the event this action is remanded, after re-

27
28

2

STIPULATION

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page3 of 6

1

docketing of the action in the Alameda Superior Court, subject to any further order of

2

either this Court or the Alameda Superior Court.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

STIPULATION

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page4 of 6

Respectfully submitted,

1
2
3

DATED: April 24, 2013

By: /s/ Sean A. Commons
Sean A. Commons
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7

Counsel for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.

8
9
10

DATED: April 24, 2013

11

By: /s/ Donald J. Putterman
Donald J. Putterman
[e-mail]
PUTTERMAN LOGAN & GILES, LLP
580 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Defendants Aaron Shoaf; Effective
Marketing Solutions, LLC; MoneyMutual,
LLC; London Bay Capital, LLC; Selling
Source, LLC; Montel Williams; and Glenn
McKay

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: April 24, 2013

By: /s/ Jeffrey Wilens
Jeffrey Wilens
[e-mail]
LAKESHORE LAW CENTER
18340 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 107-610
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 714-854-7206

27
28

Jeffrey P. Spencer
4

STIPULATION

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page5 of 6

[e-mail]
THE SPENCER LAW FIRM
903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 220
San Clemente, CA 92673
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 949-240-8515

1
2
3
4
5

Counsel for Plaintiff Sean L. Gilbert

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
24
Dated: April __, 2013

_____________________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

5

STIPULATION

Case3:13-cv-01171-JSW Document15 Filed04/24/13 Page6 of 6

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, Sean A. Commons, attest that Donald J.

3

Putterman and Jeffrey Wilens provided their authority and concurrence to file the

4

instant document and place their electronic signatures on the document set forth

5

above.

6
7

By: /s/ Sean A. Commons

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

6

STIPULATION