Sharp Electronics Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
Filing
17
ORDER Appointing Special Master. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 06/16/2008. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT)
Antitrust Litigation
)
)
)
___________________________________)
)
CRAGO, Inc.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., et
)
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
No. 07-5944 SC
MDL No.
1917
ORDER APPOINTING
SPECIAL MASTER
18
19
20
I.
SCOPE OF ORDER
1.
Order Applicable to All Cases in MDL Proceedings.
This
21
Order shall apply to all cases currently pending in MDL No. 1917
22
and to all related actions that have been or will be originally
23
filed in, transferred to, or removed to this Court and assigned
24
thereto (collectively, “the MDL proceedings”).
25
binding on all parties and their counsel in all cases currently
26
pending or subsequently made part of these proceedings and shall
27
govern each case in the proceedings unless it explicitly states
28
that it relates to specific cases.
This Order is
2.
1
Appointment of Special Master.
Pursuant to Federal Rule
2
of Civil Procedure 53 and the hearings held on April 4 and May 9,
3
and with the consent of the parties, the Court hereby appoints the
4
Honorable Charles A. Legge, United States District Court Judge
5
(Retired), as a Special Master to assist the Court in this
6
litigation (hereinafter “Judge Legge” or “Special Master”).
7
8
9
II.
BASIS FOR APPOINTMENT UNDER RULE 53(A) AND 53(B)(1)
3.
Basis for Appointment.
The Special Master is hereby
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
appointed pursuant to Rule 53(a)(1) to perform duties consented to
11
by the parties (Rule 53(a)(1)(A)), to make findings of fact on
12
issues to be decided by the Court because appointment is warranted
13
by an exceptional condition (namely, the volume of cases pending
14
in these proceedings) (Rule 53(a)(1)(B)(i)), and to address
15
pretrial and post-trial matters that cannot be addressed
16
effectively and timely by an available district judge or
17
magistrate judge of the district (Rule 53(a)(1)(C)).
18
4.
No Grounds for Disqualification.
Pursuant to Rule
19
53(a)(2) and 53(b)(3), the Special Master has filed an affidavit
20
with this Court that states that he has no relationship to the
21
parties, counsel, action, or Court that would require
22
disqualification of a judge under 28 U.S.C. § 455.
23
course of these proceedings, the Special Master and the parties
24
shall notify this Court immediately if they become aware of any
25
potential grounds that would require disqualification.
26
27
28
5.
Fairness Considerations.
During the
Pursuant to Rule 53(a)(3), the
Court has considered the fairness of imposing the likely expenses
2
1
of the Special Master on the parties.
2
appointment and use of the Special Master will materially advance
3
the litigation, thereby achieving considerable cost-saving to all
4
parties.
5
consented to the Special Master’s appointment and have agreed to
6
arrange the Special Master's compensation, as discussed in
7
paragraph 13 herein.
8
expenses and delay through regular communication with the Special
9
Master and Liaison Counsel.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
6.
The Court believes that the
Moreover, the Court notes that the parties have
The Court will protect against unreasonable
Proper Notice Given to All Parties.
Pursuant to Rule
11
53(b)(1) and the hearings held on April 4 and May 9, the Court
12
gave all parties to the MDL proceedings notice of its intent to
13
appoint the Special Master and an opportunity to be heard with
14
respect to such appointment before issuing this Order.
15
16
17
III. SPECIAL MASTER’S DUTIES, AUTHORITY, AND COMPENSATION
7.
Diligence.
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2), the Court hereby
18
directs the Special Master to proceed with all reasonable
19
diligence in performing his duties in the MDL proceedings.
20
8.
Scope of Special Master’s Duties.
Pursuant to Rule
21
53(b)(2)(A), the Special Master shall assist the Court with
22
matters such as case management, trial selection and case
23
resolution procedures, scheduling orders, specially-assigned
24
discovery motions and disputes, facilitation of inter-
25
jurisdictional coordination, and other matters in which the Court
26
wishes to utilize his services.
27
28
9.
Scope of Special Master’s Authority.
3
The Special Master
1
shall have the authority provided in Rule 53(c) and 53(d).
10.
2
Procedure for Motions Submitted to Special Master.
The
3
procedural requirements contained in this Court’s Pretrial Orders
4
shall govern any motion practice before the Special Master.
5
11.
Ex Parte Communications.
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(B),
6
the Special Master may communicate ex parte with the Court at any
7
time.
8
party absent consent of Liaison Counsel without first providing
9
notice and an opportunity to be heard to the opposing Liaison
The Special Master shall not communicate ex parte with any
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Counsel.
11
12.
Preservation of Materials and Preparation of Record.
12
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(C), the Special Master shall maintain
13
orderly files consisting of all documents submitted to him by the
14
parties and any of his written orders, findings, and/or
15
recommendations.
16
file any written orders, findings, and/or recommendations with the
17
Court via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”), as described
18
in the Court's Pretrial Order No. 1.
19
the Special Master’s duty to serve his order on the parties.
20
records of the Special Master’s activities other than his written
21
orders, findings, and/or recommendations shall be filed in
22
accordance with paragraph 17 herein.
23
13.
Pursuant to Rule 53(e), the Special Master shall
Compensation.
Such filing shall fulfill
Any
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(E) and 53(g),
24
the parties shall mutually determine the hourly rate of the
25
Special Master for his service in this MDL.
26
notify the Court of this rate so that the Court may incorporate it
27
in its orders.
28
The parties shall
The Special Master shall not charge for travel
4
1
time.
2
services, which he shall provide to Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel
3
and Defendants' Liaison Counsel.
4
Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall each be responsible for paying
5
half of the Special Master’s invoice; such invoices shall be paid
6
promptly.
7
Judge Legge shall prepare a monthly invoice for his
14.
Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and
Special Master’s Reports to Court.
Pursuant to Rule
8
53(f), the Special Master shall report to the Court as directed by
9
the Court.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
IV. ACTION ON SPECIAL MASTER’S ORDERS, REPORTS, OR RECOMMENDATIONS
15.
Scope of Section.
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(D) and
13
53(g), the procedures described in paragraphs 16 through 19 herein
14
shall govern any action on the Special Master’s orders, reports,
15
and/or recommendations.
16
16.
Time Limits for Review.
Any party wishing to file
17
objections to or a motion to adopt or modify the Special Master’s
18
orders, reports, and/or recommendations must file such objections
19
or motion with the Court within fourteen (14) days from the day
20
the Special Master filed the order, report, and/or recommendation
21
via ECF.
22
effect pending any such objection or motion.
23
17.
Any order issued by the Special Master shall remain in
Filing the Record for Review.
The party filing the
24
objection or motion shall submit with such objection or motion any
25
record necessary for the Court to review the Special Master’s
26
order, report, and/or recommendation, including any transcripts of
27
proceedings before the Special Master and any documents submitted
28
5
1
by the parties in connection with the Special Master’s order,
2
report, and/or recommendation.
3
shall constitute grounds for the Court to overrule the objection
4
or deny the motion.
5
18.
Failure to provide the record
Standard for Court’s Review.
Pursuant to the parties’
6
stipulation, the Court shall review findings of fact made or
7
recommended by the Special Master for clear error.
8
shall review de novo any conclusions of law made or recommended by
9
the Special Master.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
The Court
The Court will set aside the Special Master’s
ruling on a procedural matter only for an abuse of discretion.
19.
Court’s Actions on Master’s Orders.
Pursuant to Rule
12
53(g)(1), in acting on an order, report, or recommendation of the
13
Special Master, the Court shall afford each party an opportunity
14
to be heard and, in its discretion, may receive evidence, and may
15
adopt or affirm; modify; wholly or partly reject or reverse;
16
resubmit to the Special Master with instructions; or make any
17
further orders it deems appropriate.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: June 16, 2008
23
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?