Pragmatus AV, LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 47 Joint Request for Equipment in the Courtroom Necessary for Markman Tutorial. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/4/2014. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125)
eday@feinday.com
IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88234)
ifeinberg@feinday.com
DAVID ALBERTI (SBN 220625)
dalberti@feinday.com
YAKOV ZOLOTOREV (SBN 224260)
yzolotorev@feinday.com
MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290)
mbelloli@feinday.com
FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI &
THOMPSON LLP
1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650.618.4360
Fax: 650.618.4368
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Pragmatus AV, LLC
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
PRAGMATUS AV, LLC,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
YAHOO! INC.,
17
CASE NO. C 13-01176 EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
REQUEST FOR EQUIPMENT IN THE
COURTROOM NECESSARY FOR
MARKMAN TUTORIAL
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1FEIN BERG DAY
ALBERTI &
T H O M P S O N LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM – CASE NO. C 13-01176 EMC
1
2
3
The Court GRANTS the parties’ joint request for permission to bring certain equipment
for use in connection with the April 7, 2014 Markman Tutorial.
Parties may bring the following equipment to the courtroom on April 7, 2014:
4
•
A projector
5
•
A projector screen
6
•
A table
7
•
Electrical cords
8
•
Electronic video switching device
9
•
Notebook Computers and attached electronic data storage devices
10
The equipment will be removed immediately following the hearing on April 7, 2014.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED
S
ER
H
18
R NIA
dw
Judge E
FO
RT
17
NO
16
ED
ORDER
O
___________________________________
IT IS S
EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES rDISTRICT JUDGE
Chen
a d M.
LI
15
Dated: April __, 2014
4
UNIT
ED
14
RT
U
O
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
12
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FEIN BERG DAY
ALBERTI &
T H O M P S O N LLP
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM – CASE NO. C 13-01176 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?