Le Roy-Garcia v. Brave Arts Licensing, LLC et al
Filing 27
ORDER CONTINUING hearing on 10 Defendants' motion to dismiss. To rule on a motion to dismiss, which is a dispositive motion, all parties to this case must consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. To date, one defendant, HauteLook, Inc., has yet to either consent to or decline the undersigneds jurisdiction. Accordingly, attached to this order are copies of the forms by which HauteLook, Inc. may do so. It shall file either form by Wednesday, July 17, 2013. In light of this complication, the undersigned ORDERS Plaintiff to serve a copy of this order on HauteLook, Inc. by Friday, July 12, 2013. Furthermore, the undersigned CONTINUES the hearing on the motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to tran sfer from Thursday, July 18, 2013 to Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. (If this new date does not work for counsel, they may stip ulate to move the hearing to another one of the undersigneds civil law and motions calendars (e.g., August 15, 2013; September 5, 2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/9/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.