Ali v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 15, 2013. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2013. Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/1/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jason A. Geller, CA State Bar No. 168149
Juan C. Araneda, CA State Bar No. 213041
MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK & PEARSON LLP
575 Market Street, Suite 2200
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 644-0914
Facsimile: (415) 644-0978
Email:
jason.geller@mbtlaw.com
juan.araneda@mbtlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
RIZWAN ALI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
CASE No. C 13-1184 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
TO NOVEMBER 15, 2013
vs.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]
15
Defendant.
16
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Rizwan Ali (“PLAINTIFF”) and Defendant
17
18
JPMorgan Chase Bank (“JPMC”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS the initial Case Management Conference in this action is currently scheduled
19
20
for October 11, 2013;
WHEREAS on May 8, 2013, JPMC filed a motion to compel arbitration and to stay
21
22
proceedings pending arbitration;
WHEREAS on June 13, 2013, the Court issued an order requesting further brief on
23
24
JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration and continued the hearing on the motion to August 23,
25
2013;
26
WHEREAS on June 20, 2013, the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to
27
continue the initial Case Management Conference (previously scheduled for July 12, 2013) while
28
JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration was pending before the Court, which the Court granted;
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page2 of 4
1
WHEREAS on August 14, 2013, the Court issued an order vacating the hearing date on
2
JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration and has taken it under submission, but has not yet issued its
3
ruling;
4
WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, and to allow for a ruling on JPMC’s
5
pending motion to compel arbitration, the parties jointly request that the Court again continue the
6
Case Management Conference to November 15, 2013, or a date that is convenient for the Court;
7
WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that the Court order that the Joint Case
8
Management Statement be filed no later than five (5) court days before the scheduled Case
9
Management Conference.
10
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
11
1.
12
13
14
The Case Management Conference shall be scheduled for November 15, 2013, or
a date that is convenient for the Court.
2.
The Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than five (5) court
days before the scheduled Case Management Conference.
15
16
Dated: September 30, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM D. WHITEMAN
17
18
By:
/s/ William D. Whiteman
WILLIAM D. WHITEMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff RIZWAN ALI
19
20
21
Dated: September 30, 2013
MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK &
PEARSON LLP
22
23
By:
24
25
/s/ Juan C. Araneda
JASON A. GELLER
JUAN C. ARANEDA
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page3 of 4
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERD.
3
4
5
October 1, 2013
Dated: _______________________
HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?