Ali v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 15, 2013. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2013. Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/1/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jason A. Geller, CA State Bar No. 168149 Juan C. Araneda, CA State Bar No. 213041 MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK & PEARSON LLP 575 Market Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 644-0914 Facsimile: (415) 644-0978 Email: jason.geller@mbtlaw.com juan.araneda@mbtlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 RIZWAN ALI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 CASE No. C 13-1184 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 15, 2013 vs. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] 15 Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Rizwan Ali (“PLAINTIFF”) and Defendant 17 18 JPMorgan Chase Bank (“JPMC”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS the initial Case Management Conference in this action is currently scheduled 19 20 for October 11, 2013; WHEREAS on May 8, 2013, JPMC filed a motion to compel arbitration and to stay 21 22 proceedings pending arbitration; WHEREAS on June 13, 2013, the Court issued an order requesting further brief on 23 24 JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration and continued the hearing on the motion to August 23, 25 2013; 26 WHEREAS on June 20, 2013, the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to 27 continue the initial Case Management Conference (previously scheduled for July 12, 2013) while 28 JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration was pending before the Court, which the Court granted; 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page2 of 4 1 WHEREAS on August 14, 2013, the Court issued an order vacating the hearing date on 2 JPMC’s motion to compel arbitration and has taken it under submission, but has not yet issued its 3 ruling; 4 WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, and to allow for a ruling on JPMC’s 5 pending motion to compel arbitration, the parties jointly request that the Court again continue the 6 Case Management Conference to November 15, 2013, or a date that is convenient for the Court; 7 WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that the Court order that the Joint Case 8 Management Statement be filed no later than five (5) court days before the scheduled Case 9 Management Conference. 10 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 11 1. 12 13 14 The Case Management Conference shall be scheduled for November 15, 2013, or a date that is convenient for the Court. 2. The Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than five (5) court days before the scheduled Case Management Conference. 15 16 Dated: September 30, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM D. WHITEMAN 17 18 By: /s/ William D. Whiteman WILLIAM D. WHITEMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff RIZWAN ALI 19 20 21 Dated: September 30, 2013 MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK & PEARSON LLP 22 23 By: 24 25 /s/ Juan C. Araneda JASON A. GELLER JUAN C. ARANEDA Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case3:13-cv-01184-JSW Document29 Filed09/30/13 Page3 of 4 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERD. 3 4 5 October 1, 2013 Dated: _______________________ HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?