Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al v. Hoffman
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/27/2013 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 6/18/2013. 6/13/13 CMC vacated. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/4/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
Northern District of California
5
6
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
7
No. C 13-1185 MEJ
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
8
9
10
KENNETH HOFFMAN and DIANE
HOFFMAN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
On March 15, 2013, Defendants Kenneth and Diane Hoffman removed this unlawful detainer
13 action from Contra Costa County Superior Court. However, an unlawful detainer action does not
14 arise under federal law but is purely a creature of California law. Wells Fargo Bank v. Lapeen, 2011
15 WL 2194117, at *3 (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2011); Wescom Credit Union v. Dudley, 2010 WL 4916578, at
16 *2 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010). Thus, it appears that jurisdiction is lacking and the case should be
17 remanded to state court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendants Kenneth and Diane Hoffman
18 to show cause why this case should not be remanded to the Contra Costa County Superior Court.
19 Defendants shall file a declaration by June 18, 2013, and the Court shall conduct a hearing on June
20 27, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
21 California. In the declaration, Defendants must address how this Court has jurisdiction over
22 Plaintiff’s unlawful detainer claim.
23
Defendants should be mindful that an anticipated federal defense or counterclaim is not
24 sufficient to confer jurisdiction. Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation
25 Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 (1983); Berg v. Leason, 32 F.3d 422, 426 (9th Cir.1994). “A case may not be
26 removed to federal court on the basis of a federal defense, . . . even if the defense is anticipated in the
27 plaintiff's complaint, and even if both parties admit that the defense is the only question truly at issue
28 in the case.” ARCO Environmental Remediation, LLC v. Dept. of Health and Environmental Quality
1 of the State of Montana, 213 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Valles v. Ivy Hill Corp., 410
2 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A federal law defense to a state-law claim does not confer
3 jurisdiction on a federal court, even if the defense is that of federal preemption and is anticipated in
4 the plaintiff's complaint.”). Thus, any anticipated defense, such as a claim under the Protecting
5 Tenants at Foreclosure Act (“PTFA”), Pub.L. No. 111–22, § 702, 123 Stat. 1632 (2009), is not a valid
6 ground for removal. See e.g. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Montoya, 2011 WL 5508926, at *4
7 (E.D.Cal. Nov. 9, 2011); SD Coastline LP v. Buck, 2010 WL 4809661, at *2–3 (S.D.Cal. Nov.19,
8 2010); Wescom Credit Union v. Dudley, 2010 WL 4916578, at 2–3 (C.D.Cal. Nov. 22, 2010); Aurora
9 Loan Services, LLC v. Martinez, 2010 WL 1266887, at * 1 (N.D.Cal. March 29, 2010).
The June 13, 2013 Case Management Conference is VACATED.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
13 Dated: June 4, 2013
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
No. C 13-01185 MEJ
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Plaintiff(s),
v.
6
KENNETH HOFFMAN,
7
Defendant(s).
8
/
9
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
10 Court, Northern District of California.
11 That on June 4, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
12 envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located
in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15 Kenneth and Diane Hoffman
1274 Lawrence Road
16 Danville, CA 94506
17
18 Dated: June 4, 2013
19
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Rose Maher, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?