Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al v. Hoffman

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/27/2013 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 6/18/2013. 6/13/13 CMC vacated. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/4/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 Northern District of California 5 6 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, 7 No. C 13-1185 MEJ ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 8 9 10 KENNETH HOFFMAN and DIANE HOFFMAN, Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 On March 15, 2013, Defendants Kenneth and Diane Hoffman removed this unlawful detainer 13 action from Contra Costa County Superior Court. However, an unlawful detainer action does not 14 arise under federal law but is purely a creature of California law. Wells Fargo Bank v. Lapeen, 2011 15 WL 2194117, at *3 (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2011); Wescom Credit Union v. Dudley, 2010 WL 4916578, at 16 *2 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010). Thus, it appears that jurisdiction is lacking and the case should be 17 remanded to state court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendants Kenneth and Diane Hoffman 18 to show cause why this case should not be remanded to the Contra Costa County Superior Court. 19 Defendants shall file a declaration by June 18, 2013, and the Court shall conduct a hearing on June 20 27, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 21 California. In the declaration, Defendants must address how this Court has jurisdiction over 22 Plaintiff’s unlawful detainer claim. 23 Defendants should be mindful that an anticipated federal defense or counterclaim is not 24 sufficient to confer jurisdiction. Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation 25 Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 (1983); Berg v. Leason, 32 F.3d 422, 426 (9th Cir.1994). “A case may not be 26 removed to federal court on the basis of a federal defense, . . . even if the defense is anticipated in the 27 plaintiff's complaint, and even if both parties admit that the defense is the only question truly at issue 28 in the case.” ARCO Environmental Remediation, LLC v. Dept. of Health and Environmental Quality 1 of the State of Montana, 213 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Valles v. Ivy Hill Corp., 410 2 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A federal law defense to a state-law claim does not confer 3 jurisdiction on a federal court, even if the defense is that of federal preemption and is anticipated in 4 the plaintiff's complaint.”). Thus, any anticipated defense, such as a claim under the Protecting 5 Tenants at Foreclosure Act (“PTFA”), Pub.L. No. 111–22, § 702, 123 Stat. 1632 (2009), is not a valid 6 ground for removal. See e.g. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Montoya, 2011 WL 5508926, at *4 7 (E.D.Cal. Nov. 9, 2011); SD Coastline LP v. Buck, 2010 WL 4809661, at *2–3 (S.D.Cal. Nov.19, 8 2010); Wescom Credit Union v. Dudley, 2010 WL 4916578, at 2–3 (C.D.Cal. Nov. 22, 2010); Aurora 9 Loan Services, LLC v. Martinez, 2010 WL 1266887, at * 1 (N.D.Cal. March 29, 2010). The June 13, 2013 Case Management Conference is VACATED. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 13 Dated: June 4, 2013 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., No. C 13-01185 MEJ 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff(s), v. 6 KENNETH HOFFMAN, 7 Defendant(s). 8 / 9 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District 10 Court, Northern District of California. 11 That on June 4, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said 12 envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 Kenneth and Diane Hoffman 1274 Lawrence Road 16 Danville, CA 94506 17 18 Dated: June 4, 2013 19 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Rose Maher, Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?