Kibby Road, LLC v. Rousset et al

Filing 17

ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

KIBBY ROAD, LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

No. C 13-01200 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER RE MOTION
TO REMAND

VALERIE J. ROUSSET, JEAN-PAUL
ROUSSET, and DOES 1 to 10,
Defendants.
/

15
16

On April 10, 2013, plaintiff Kibby Road, LLC, filed a motion to remand. Pursuant

17

to Local Rule 7-3, defendants’ opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due by

18

April 29. None was received. After the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge on May

19

1, plaintiff renoticed its motion for hearing on June 20. Accordingly, because defendants failed

20

to timely respond to the motion, the following briefing schedule is hereby set. Defendant’s

21

opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to remand is due by NOON ON MAY 29.

22

Plaintiff’s reply brief, if any, must be filed seven days thereafter.

23
24

For the benefit of defendant, who is proceeding pro se, the parties are hereby warned that
failure to timely respond to the motion to remand could result in the motion being granted.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 15, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE