Actuate Corporation v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO DISMISS CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/1/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013)
1 LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC
James M. Lee (Bar No. 192301)
2 Cyrus Khojandpour (Bar No. 260233)
601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 4025
3 Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: (213) 612-3737
4 Fax: (213) 612-3773
Email: james.lee@ ltlattorneys.com ,
5
cyrus.khojandpour@ltlattorneys.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Actuate Corporation
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
) CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-1202-MEJ
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
)
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
)
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
)
v.
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
)
41(a)(1)
)
)
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY., an Illinois )
)
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
S DISTRICT
TE
)
C
TA
)
Defendants.
)
)
TED
)
GRAN
)
ACTUATE CORPORATION, a
15 Delaware corporation,
20
22
23
RT
U
O
21
24
ER
LI
Ju
A
H
27
RT
26
s
na Jame
ria-Ele
dge Ma
NO
25
R NIA
19
FO
18
S
17
UNIT
ED
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
Dated:
7/1/2013
DISMISSAL
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Actuate Corporation (“Actuate”) filed this action
2 against Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance”);
3
WHEREAS, Reliance has not yet answered the Complaint in this matter;
4
WHEREAS, the parties have settled the action;
5
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
6 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and the terms of the Agreement of the parties, Actuate, through its
7 counsel of record hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action with
8 prejudice. Pursuant to agreement of the parties, each party will bear its own costs,
9 expenses, and legal fees.
10
11
12 DATED: June 28, 2013
LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC
13
14
15
16
17
By
James M. Lee
Cyrus Khojandpour
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Actuate Corporation
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?