Net Connection Hayward, LLC v. City of Hayward
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to File Supplemental Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 05/21/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
STEPHEN J. MEYER (Bar No. 75326)
TORY E. GRIFFIN (Bar No. 186181)
KELLY L. POPE (Bar No. 235284)
1420 Rocky Ridge Dr., Suite 250
Roseville, CA 95661-2859
Telephone: (916) 773-2100
Facsimile: (916) 773-4004
smeyer@downeybrand.com
tgriffin@downeybrand.com
kpope@downeybrand.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Net Connection Hayward, LLC
8
14
MICHAEL S. LAWSON (SBN 048172)
City Attorney
MICHAEL G. VIGILIA (SBN 228353)
Assistant City Attorney
CITY OF HAYWARD
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541-5007
Tel: (510) 583-4450
Fax: (510) 583-3660
Michael.lawson@hayward-ca.gov
Michael.vigilia@hayward-ca.gov
15
Attorneys for Defendant City of Hayward
9
10
11
12
13
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
Net Connection Hayward, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
Case No. C13-1212 SC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF
v.
City of Hayward,
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
On May 2, 2013, this Court issued an order requesting supplementary briefing after an
evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff Net Connection Hayward, LLC’s (“Net Connection”) motion for
28
1310428.1
1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF
1
preliminary injunction. The Court set the briefing schedule as follows: Net Connection’s
2
supplementary opening brief was to be filed within ten days of the Court’s order. Defendant the
3
City of Hayward (the “City of Hayward”) then has ten days from the filing date of Net
4
Connection’s brief to submit its supplementary opposition brief. Net Connection then has five
5
days to submit a supplemental reply brief.
6
Net Connection filed its supplementary opening brief on May 13, 2013. As a result, the
7
City of Hayward’s supplementary opposition brief is due May 23, 2013 and Net Connection’s
8
supplementary reply brief is due May 28, 2013, per Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a).
9
Given that three of the five days in which Net Connection has to file a reply brief fall on a
10
holiday weekend (May 25-27), Net Connection requested that the City stipulate to allowing Net
11
Connection an additional two days, until May 30, to file its reply brief. The City graciously
12
granted this request.
13
Accordingly, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE
14
to extend the time Net Connection has to file its supplementary reply brief presently due on May
15
28, 2013. The deadline to file Net Connection’s reply brief under the Court’s May 2, 2013 Order
16
shall be extended up to and including May 30, 2013.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
19
DATED: May 16, 2013
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
20
By:
21
/s Tory E. Griffin
TORY E. GRIFFIN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Net Connection Hayward, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1310428.1
2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF
1
DATED: May 16, 2013
MICHAEL S. LAWSON, CITY ATTORNEY
2
3
By:
s/ Michael G. Vigilia (as authorized 5/16/13)
MICHAEL G. VIGILIA
Assistant City Attorney, City of Hayward
Attorney for Defendant City of Hayward
4
5
6
ORDER
7
Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court
8
reply brief shall now be filed on or before May 30, 2013.
05/21/2013
DATED:__________________________
a
Judge S
RT
16
nti
muel Co
NO
15
FO
14
R NIA
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
H
ER
LI
13
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
17
18
A
11
by the Court’s May 2, 2013 Order by an additional two days. Net Connection’s supplemental
S
10
hereby extends the deadline for Net Connection to file its supplementary reply brief as required
UNIT
ED
9
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1310428.1
3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?