Net Connection Hayward, LLC v. City of Hayward

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to File Supplemental Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 05/21/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DOWNEY BRAND LLP STEPHEN J. MEYER (Bar No. 75326) TORY E. GRIFFIN (Bar No. 186181) KELLY L. POPE (Bar No. 235284) 1420 Rocky Ridge Dr., Suite 250 Roseville, CA 95661-2859 Telephone: (916) 773-2100 Facsimile: (916) 773-4004 smeyer@downeybrand.com tgriffin@downeybrand.com kpope@downeybrand.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Net Connection Hayward, LLC 8 14 MICHAEL S. LAWSON (SBN 048172) City Attorney MICHAEL G. VIGILIA (SBN 228353) Assistant City Attorney CITY OF HAYWARD 777 B Street, 4th Floor Hayward, CA 94541-5007 Tel: (510) 583-4450 Fax: (510) 583-3660 Michael.lawson@hayward-ca.gov Michael.vigilia@hayward-ca.gov 15 Attorneys for Defendant City of Hayward 9 10 11 12 13 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 Net Connection Hayward, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 Case No. C13-1212 SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF v. City of Hayward, Defendant. 24 25 26 27 On May 2, 2013, this Court issued an order requesting supplementary briefing after an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff Net Connection Hayward, LLC’s (“Net Connection”) motion for 28 1310428.1 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF 1 preliminary injunction. The Court set the briefing schedule as follows: Net Connection’s 2 supplementary opening brief was to be filed within ten days of the Court’s order. Defendant the 3 City of Hayward (the “City of Hayward”) then has ten days from the filing date of Net 4 Connection’s brief to submit its supplementary opposition brief. Net Connection then has five 5 days to submit a supplemental reply brief. 6 Net Connection filed its supplementary opening brief on May 13, 2013. As a result, the 7 City of Hayward’s supplementary opposition brief is due May 23, 2013 and Net Connection’s 8 supplementary reply brief is due May 28, 2013, per Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a). 9 Given that three of the five days in which Net Connection has to file a reply brief fall on a 10 holiday weekend (May 25-27), Net Connection requested that the City stipulate to allowing Net 11 Connection an additional two days, until May 30, to file its reply brief. The City graciously 12 granted this request. 13 Accordingly, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE 14 to extend the time Net Connection has to file its supplementary reply brief presently due on May 15 28, 2013. The deadline to file Net Connection’s reply brief under the Court’s May 2, 2013 Order 16 shall be extended up to and including May 30, 2013. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 DATED: May 16, 2013 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 20 By: 21 /s Tory E. Griffin TORY E. GRIFFIN Attorney for Plaintiff Net Connection Hayward, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1310428.1 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF 1 DATED: May 16, 2013 MICHAEL S. LAWSON, CITY ATTORNEY 2 3 By: s/ Michael G. Vigilia (as authorized 5/16/13) MICHAEL G. VIGILIA Assistant City Attorney, City of Hayward Attorney for Defendant City of Hayward 4 5 6 ORDER 7 Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court 8 reply brief shall now be filed on or before May 30, 2013. 05/21/2013 DATED:__________________________ a Judge S RT 16 nti muel Co NO 15 FO 14 R NIA ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE H ER LI 13 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA 17 18 A 11 by the Court’s May 2, 2013 Order by an additional two days. Net Connection’s supplemental S 10 hereby extends the deadline for Net Connection to file its supplementary reply brief as required UNIT ED 9 N D IS T IC T R OF C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1310428.1 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?