Net Connection Hayward, LLC v. City of Hayward

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is so Ordered as Modified. The Motion for Summary Judgment shall be submitted on the papers and no appearance will be required. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 05/01/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

TORY E. GRIFFIN (SBN 186181)
HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP
1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counterdefendant
NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC
MICHAEL S. LAWSON (SBN 048172)
City Attorney
MICHAEL G. VIGILIA (SBN 228353)
Assistant City Attorney
CITY OF HAYWARD
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541-5007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant
CITY OF HAYWARD

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

–o0o–

16
17

NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC, a California
limited liability company

1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661

HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP

18
19
20

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT HEARING
IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED
Hon. Samuel Conti, Courtroom 1

v.
CITY OF HAYWARD,

21

NO. C13-01212 SC

Defendants.

Trial Date: August 4, 2014

22
23

CITY OF HAYWARD
Counterclaimant,

24
25
26
27

v.
NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC, a California
limited liability company,
Counterdefendant.

28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC V. CITY OF HAYWARD

NO. C13-01212 SC

1

Due to scheduling conflicts in which Plaintiff-counterdefendant’s counsel will not be in

2

the state, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto

3

through their respective counsel that the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of

4

Defendant-Counterclaimant City of Hayward, filed on April 28, 2014, and noticed for hearing on

5

June 6, 2014, at 10:00a.m., be continued to June 20, 2014 at 10:00a.m. or as soon thereafter as

6

the matter can be heard.

7

The trial date is set for August 4, 2014 and was continued on March 19, 2014 pursuant to

8

Court order based on stipulation of the parties. This Court order set the last day to hear motions

9

as June 6, 2014. Because Plaintiff-Counterdefendant’s counsel is unavailable due to a pre-

10

planned vacation on June 6, 2014, the parties ask the Court to approve continuing this hearing on

11

the Defendant-Counterclaimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment to June 20, 2014, which the

12

parties understand to be the next available date on the Court’s calendar to hear the motion.

13
14

The parties do not request or anticipate any other required changes to the scheduling order
in this case.

15
16

Dated: May 1, 2014

HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP

17
/S/
TORY E. GRIFFIN
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counterdefendant
NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC

1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661

HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP

18
19
20
21

Dated: May 1, 2014

MICHAEL S. LAWSON, CITY ATTORNEY

22
23
24

/S/
MICHAEL G. VIGILIA
Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant
CITY OF HAYWARD

25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

NET CONNECTION HAYWARD, LLC V. CITY OF HAYWARD

NO. C13-01212 SC

1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
4
Good cause appearing before this Court and upon stipulation of the parties, it is hereby

TA

H

12

RN

FO

LI

RT

11

el Conti
The Motion for Summary Judgment shall be
g ONTI u
dCe Sam
Ju
HON. SAMUEL
submitted on the papers and no appearances United States District Judge
will be required.
E

NO

10

01
Dated: May _____, 2014

A

9

D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO

R NIA

8

UNIT
ED

Hearing be continued to ________________, 2014 at _______________.
7

RT
U
O

6

DISTR

I Summary Judgment
S
ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant-Counterclaimant’sEMotion for CT C
T
S

5

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

13
14
15
16
17

1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661

HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING