DG Berry, Inc v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE filed by DG Berry, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/11/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
2
3
4
Effie F. Anastassiou, Esq. (SBN 96279)
Stephen J. Beals, Esq. (SBN 226365)
ANASTASSIOU&ASSOCIATES
242 Capitol Street
Post Office Box 2210
Salinas, California 93902
Telephone: (831) 754-2501
Facsimile: (831) 754-0621
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
DG Berry, Inc.
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
INC.,
a
California)
Plaintiff,
~
)
)
)
)
STRAWBERR Y)
INC., a California)
)
)
Defendant.
)
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-OI236
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL,
WITH PREJUDICE
FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2)
------------------------ )
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
18
Rule 41(a)(2), by and between each and every party to this stipulation, by and through the signatures of
19
their respective counsel on this stipulation, that the parties to this stipulation wish to formally
20
acknowledge and obtain a court order dismissing the entire instant action, as follows:
21
1.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among PlaintiffDG BERRY, INC. ("Plaintiff')
22
and Defendant DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Defendant") that they are
23
requesting that a Court order be entered dismissing, with prejudice, the entire instant action, pursuant to
24
a settlement reached by Plaintiff and Defendant as a result of a successful mediation session.
25
26
2.
The undersigned represent and warrant that they have all requisite authority to bind the
respective parties to the terms of the stipulation.
27
28
DG Berry, Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates. Inc.
Case No.3: 13-cv-O 1236
Stipulated Request for Dismissal
1
3.
This stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as
2
if all signatories had signed the same documents. All counterparts must be construed together to
3
constitute one instrument.
4
4.
Each party shall bear that party's own costs and attorneys' fees in connection with this
ANASTASSIOU & ASSOCIATES
By:
t.£ , ~~(>---
~E~~~--~~=---------
A
ys for Plaintiff
DG Berry, Inc.
L+G,LLP
By: ~__~~~~~________
James W. Sullivan, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.
ORDER
17
18
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire instant action is
hereby dismissed, with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ __
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
23
F:IDGBlDriscoll\PleadingslDismissailStipulated Dismissai.wpd
24
25
26
27
28
DG Berry, Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.
Case No. 3:13-cv-01236
Stipulated Request for Dismissal
2
3.
2
This stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as
if all signatories had signed the same documents. All counterparts must be construed together to
3 constitute one instrument.
4
4_
Each party sball bear that party's own costs and attoroeys' fees in connection with this
ANASTASSIOU & ASSOCIATES
By:
nE:liiftj'::e"TF'.Anastas~==S1:;:·
o=u,""1Es=q-.- - Attorneys for Plaintiff
DG Berry, Inc.
-~ f'.....
Bll"'~
OTaiIle8WSiimvan;q:
Attorneys for Defendant
Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.
ORDER
UNIT
ED
S
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
M. Chen
FO
RT
Judge Edward
H
ER
R NIA
GRANTED
NO
F:IDGBlDriscolllPleadingslDismisaallStipulated Dismis.a1.wpd
TED
GRAN
LI
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
dwar
Judge E
27
28
DG Berry. Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry A.ssociates. Inc.
Case No. 3:13-ev-01236
A
H
ER
LI
RT
26
en
d M. Ch
NO
2S
R NIA
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
FO
10/11/13
Dated:_ _ _ _ _ __
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
21
SO ORDERED.
A
20
hereby dismissed, with prejudice.
S
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire instant action is
UNIT
ED
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Stipulated Request for Dismissal
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?