DG Berry, Inc v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE filed by DG Berry, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/11/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)

Download PDF
2 3 4 Effie F. Anastassiou, Esq. (SBN 96279) Stephen J. Beals, Esq. (SBN 226365) ANASTASSIOU&ASSOCIATES 242 Capitol Street Post Office Box 2210 Salinas, California 93902 Telephone: (831) 754-2501 Facsimile: (831) 754-0621 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, DG Berry, Inc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INC., a California) Plaintiff, ~ ) ) ) ) STRAWBERR Y) INC., a California) ) ) Defendant. ) CASE NO. 3:13-cv-OI236 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) ------------------------ ) 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 18 Rule 41(a)(2), by and between each and every party to this stipulation, by and through the signatures of 19 their respective counsel on this stipulation, that the parties to this stipulation wish to formally 20 acknowledge and obtain a court order dismissing the entire instant action, as follows: 21 1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among PlaintiffDG BERRY, INC. ("Plaintiff') 22 and Defendant DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Defendant") that they are 23 requesting that a Court order be entered dismissing, with prejudice, the entire instant action, pursuant to 24 a settlement reached by Plaintiff and Defendant as a result of a successful mediation session. 25 26 2. The undersigned represent and warrant that they have all requisite authority to bind the respective parties to the terms of the stipulation. 27 28 DG Berry, Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates. Inc. Case No.3: 13-cv-O 1236 Stipulated Request for Dismissal 1 3. This stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as 2 if all signatories had signed the same documents. All counterparts must be construed together to 3 constitute one instrument. 4 4. Each party shall bear that party's own costs and attorneys' fees in connection with this ANASTASSIOU & ASSOCIATES By: t.£ , ~~(>--- ~E~~~--~~=--------- A ys for Plaintiff DG Berry, Inc. L+G,LLP By: ~__~~~~~________ James W. Sullivan, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire instant action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 23 F:IDGBlDriscoll\PleadingslDismissailStipulated Dismissai.wpd 24 25 26 27 28 DG Berry, Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. Case No. 3:13-cv-01236 Stipulated Request for Dismissal 2 3. 2 This stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all signatories had signed the same documents. All counterparts must be construed together to 3 constitute one instrument. 4 4_ Each party sball bear that party's own costs and attoroeys' fees in connection with this ANASTASSIOU & ASSOCIATES By: nE:liiftj'::e"TF'.Anastas~==S1:;:· o=u,""1Es=q-.- - Attorneys for Plaintiff DG Berry, Inc. -~ f'..... Bll"'~ OTaiIle8WSiimvan;q: Attorneys for Defendant Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. ORDER UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O M. Chen FO RT Judge Edward H ER R NIA GRANTED NO F:IDGBlDriscolllPleadingslDismisaallStipulated Dismis.a1.wpd TED GRAN LI 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 dwar Judge E 27 28 DG Berry. Inc. v. Driscoll Strawberry A.ssociates. Inc. Case No. 3:13-ev-01236 A H ER LI RT 26 en d M. Ch NO 2S R NIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 FO 10/11/13 Dated:_ _ _ _ _ __ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 21 SO ORDERED. A 20 hereby dismissed, with prejudice. S 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire instant action is UNIT ED 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C Stipulated Request for Dismissal 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?