Marks v. San Leandro Police Department et al
Filing
5
DATA ENTRY ERROR (wrong document filed into this case). --ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/24/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013)
Case3:12-cv-03719-CRB Document31 Filed04/18/13 Page1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
KEITH HOPKINS,
v.
M. CATE, et al.,
CV 12 3719 (CRB)
Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Judge:
The Honorable Charles R.
Breyer
Trial Date:
n/a
Action Filed: July 16, 2012
Defendants.
18
19
For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to
20
Hopkins’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss up to and including May 30, 2013, or
21
fourteen days after Hopkins files and serves his opposition, whichever is later is GRANTED.
22
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition
23
is filed and served upon them or by May 30, 2013, whichever date is later.
FO
h
Judge C
LI
RT
1
reyer
B
arles R.
NO
28
ERE
R NIA
S
27
O ORD
IT IS S
H
E
A
26
RT
U
O
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
Dated:_______
________________________________________________
4/23/2013
TA
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
D
UNIT
ED
24
C
R Opp’n Mot. Dismiss (CV 12 3719 (CRB))
[Proposed] Order Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?