Marks v. San Leandro Police Department et al

Filing 5

DATA ENTRY ERROR (wrong document filed into this case). --ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/24/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-03719-CRB Document31 Filed04/18/13 Page1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 KEITH HOPKINS, v. M. CATE, et al., CV 12 3719 (CRB) Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO DISPOSITIVE MOTION Judge: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer Trial Date: n/a Action Filed: July 16, 2012 Defendants. 18 19 For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to 20 Hopkins’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss up to and including May 30, 2013, or 21 fourteen days after Hopkins files and serves his opposition, whichever is later is GRANTED. 22 Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition 23 is filed and served upon them or by May 30, 2013, whichever date is later. FO h Judge C LI RT 1 reyer B arles R. NO 28 ERE R NIA S 27 O ORD IT IS S H E A 26 RT U O 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C Dated:_______ ________________________________________________ 4/23/2013 TA CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge D UNIT ED 24 C R Opp’n Mot. Dismiss (CV 12 3719 (CRB)) [Proposed] Order Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply N F D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?