Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al

Filing 65

ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION ON AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to December 6, 2013. Proposed defendants/intervenors' motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than Septe mber 16, 2013, and noticed for hearing on December 6, 2013. Plaintiffs' opposition to the respective motions to dismiss shall be filed no later than October 14, 2013; the Court declines to adopt defendants' proposal as to the manner in whi ch plaintiffs may file their opposition to the respective motions to dismiss. The replies shall be filed no later than November 1, 2013. The parties' stipulation with respect to page limits as to the defendants/intervenors' motion is not approved. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

STEVE ELLIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

17

ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION ON
AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v.
STEVE P. BRADBURY, et al.,
Defendants,

15
16

No. C-13-1266 MMC

and
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, et al.

18

Proposed DefendantsIntervenors

19

/

20
21
22
23

Before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Stipulation on Amended Briefing Schedule for
Motions to Dismiss,” filed August 2, 2013.
The Court having read and considered the stipulation, the stipulation is hereby

24

APPROVED, with the exception of (1) the date for the hearing on the motions to dismiss,

25

which shall be December 6, 2013, to allow for adequate review by the Court, and (2) the

26

stipulated length of proposed defendants/intervenors’ motion to dismiss, the need for such

27

additional pages neither having been shown nor otherwise appearing from the record filed

28

to date.

1
2
3

Further, the Court declines to adopt defendants’ proposal as to the manner by which
plaintiffs may file their opposition to the respective motions to dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: August 6, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2