Ellis et al v. Bradbury et al

Filing 77

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME; GRANTING LIMITED INTERIM EXTENSION TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS. The Court, pending ruling on the motion to enlarge time, grants plaintiffs a limited interim extension to October 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

STEVE ELLIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

17
18

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME; GRANTING LIMITED
INTERIM EXTENSION TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v.
STEVEN P. BRADBURY, et al.,
Defendants

15
16

No. C-13-1266 MMC

and
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, et al.,
Defendant-Intervenors.

/

19
20

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion to Enlarge Time, filed October 8, 2013, by which

21

plaintiffs seek to extend, from October 14, 2013 to October 28, 2013, the deadline for filing

22

their opposition to defendants’ and intervenors’ respective motions to dismiss.

23

Because any opposition thereto is not due until October 15, 2013, see Civil L.R. 6-

24

3(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1), the Court, pending ruling on the matter, hereby

25

GRANTS plaintiffs a limited interim extension to October 18, 2013.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: October 11, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge