Allen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.

Filing 134

ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria denying 89 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 90 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 91 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 110 Administrative Motion to File Und er Seal; denying 116 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 119 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 123 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 127 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Parties have 7 days from the date of the order to file any renewed motions to seal. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ERIN ALLEN, Case No. 13-cv-01279-VC Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL 9 10 CONAGRA FOODS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 89, 90, 91, 110, 116, 119, 123, Defendant. 127 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on the plaintiff's motion for class 14 certification, the motions to file under seal are denied. Any party that believes that good cause 15 exists for sealing any part of any document filed in this case may, within 7 days of the date of this 16 order, file a renewed motion to file under seal. Any motion must be narrowly tailored to include 17 only sealable material, and must comply with all the requirements of Civil Local Rule 79-5. If no 18 such motion is filed, all documents currently filed with the Court will be opened to public 19 inspection. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 4, 2014 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?