Pierce et al v. Cantil-Sakauye et al

Filing 41

ORDER DENYING DEMAND RE LOCAL RULE 3-15. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/18/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RONALD PIERCE, et al., 12 No. C 13-01295 JSW Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 v. ORDER DENYING DEMAND RE LOCAL RULE 3-15 CALIF CHIEF JUSTICE CANTILSAKAUYE, et al., (Docket No. 38.) 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 On July 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a demand that this Court comply with Northern 17 District Civil Local Rule 3-15 and refer their motions to disqualify to another judge for 18 determination. Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-15 provides that “[w]henever an affidavit 19 of bias or prejudice directed at a Judge of this Court is filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, and 20 the Judge has determined not to recuse him or herself and found that the affidavit is neither 21 legally insufficient nor interposed for delay, the Judge shall refer the request for disqualification 22 to the Clerk for random assignment to another Judge.” Plaintiffs are correct that the Local Rule uses the term “shall.” However, Plaintiffs 23 24 ignore the preceding clause which requires a finding that an affidavit is “neither legally 25 insufficient nor interposed for delay.” Thus, referral is mandatory only when the Court 26 determines not to recuse itself and a party’s affidavit is legally sufficient and is not interposed 27 for delay. 28 // 1 2 3 4 5 6 However, this Court has twice determined that Plaintiffs’ affidavits are legally insufficient. For that reason, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ most recent demand. The parties shall appear on July 26, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. for the hearing on the pending motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 18, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?