ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 143

ORDER GRANTING 142 Stipulated Dismissal of Defendant Extreme Networks, Inc with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/30/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)

Case3:13-cv-01300-JSW Document142-1 Filed07/29/13 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Robert Auchter (Pro Hac Vice)
MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
1999 K Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and
ChriMar Holding Company, LLC.
Robert J. Walters (Pro Hac Vice)
Charles J. Hawkins (Pro Hac Vice)
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-756-8087
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Extreme Networks, Inc.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS
Technologies and ChriMar Holding
Company, LLC,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23

3:13-cv-1300-JSW
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT
EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. WITH
PREJUDICE

v.
Cisco Systems Inc., Cisco Consumer
Products LLC, Cisco-Linksys LLC,
Hewlett-Packard Co. and Extreme
Networks, Inc.,,

Judge:

Honorable Jeffrey S. White

24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-1300-JSW

Case3:13-cv-01300-JSW Document142-1 Filed07/29/13 Page2 of 2

1
2
The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by
3
ChriMar Systems, Inc., ChriMar Holding Company, LLC (collectively “ChriMar”) and Extreme
4
Networks, Inc. should be GRANTED.
5
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims made by ChriMar against Extreme
6
Networks, Inc. and all counterclaims made by Extreme Networks, Inc. against ChriMar are
7
hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the
8
License and Settlement Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this
9
litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be
10
borne solely by the party incurring the same.
11
This is a final judgment.
12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: July 30, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-1300-JSW