Edstrom et al v. Anheuser-Busch InBEV SA/NV et al
Filing
76
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 75 TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS OF WITNESSES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
STEVEN EDSTROM, et al.,
No. C 13-1309 MMC
Plaintiffs,
12
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY AND
DEPOSITIONS OF WITNESSES
v.
13
ANHEUSER-BUSCH InBEV SA/NV, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, plaintiffs’ “Motion to Compel Production of
Documents Filed Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and to Compel Depositions of
Witnesses,” filed June 28, 2013, and all further discovery matters, are hereby REFERRED
to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the convenience of the assigned
Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
After the parties have met and conferred, see Civil L.R. 37-1, the parties shall
prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute; up to 12 pages of
attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil
Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions - General > Discovery Letter
Brief.” The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties as to
how that Magistrate Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling,
order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing.
1
2
3
4
The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance, if
any, by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?