Gitson et al v. Trader Joe's Company

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Request For Order Changing Time Relating To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss and, in the Alternative, Motion To Strike and Request for Judicial Notice Response/Opposition to motion due b y 8/16/2013. Reply due by 8/30/2013. Motion Hearing on 35 Motion to Dismiss set for 9/18/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/29/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

AMY GITSON, CHRISTINE VODICKA and
DEBORAH ROSS, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

7

Plaintiffs,

8
9

v.
TRADER JOE’S COMPANY,

10

Case No. 13-CV-1333 WHO
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING
BRIEFING AND HEARING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO
STRIKE AND REQUEST FOR
JUDICIAL NOTICE

Defendant.

11
ORDER

12

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time Relating

13
14

to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and, in the alternative, Motion to Strike and Request for

15

Judicial Notice the “Motion to Dismiss”). Dkt. No. 39. Good cause appearing therefor, with

16

minor modifications to the schedule proposed by the parties, the Court sets the following briefing

17

and hearing schedule on the Motion to Dismiss filed on July 12, 2013:

18



Plaintiffs’ Opposition to be filed by August 16, 2013;

19



Defendant’s Reply to be filed by August 30, 2013;

20



Hearing set for September 18, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: July 29, 2013

_________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge