Benz v. The Clorox Company
Filing
22
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (Private ADR - Mediation) re #20 STIPULATION and Proposed Order. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/19/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL BENZ,
CASE NO. C13-01361 WHO
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CLOROX COMPANY,
AMENDED STIPULATION AND
ORDER SELECTING ADR
PROCESS
Defendant.
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have had additional conferences regarding ADR and seek to
amend their previously-filed stipulation under Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5 as follows:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
☐
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
X
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties consent to private
mediation before Mark S. Rudy.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X
other requested deadline On or by October 31, 2013, subject to the mediator’s
availability.
Dated: 8-15-2013
/s/ Dennis J. Woodruff
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 8-15-2013
/s/ Susan W. Pangborn
Attorney for Defendant
ORDER
☐
☐
Dated:
The parties’ amended stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ amended stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO
ORDERED.
August 16, 2013
Judge William H. Orrick
UNITED STATES JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
US2008
Rev. 12/11 4834799 1
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?