Benz v. The Clorox Company

Filing 30

STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES re #29 Proposed Order filed by The Clorox Company. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/09/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS JOHN WOODRUFF
DENNIS JOHN WOODRUFF (State Bar No. 56369)
[e-mail]
886 Longridge Road
Oakland, CA 94610
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
CAROL BENZ

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
SUSAN W. PANGBORN (State Bar No. 282533)
[e-mail]
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415 576 0300
FLORA MANSHIP (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
THE CLOROX COMPANY

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18

CAROL BENZ,
Plaintiff,

19
20

Case No. 13-cv-01361 WHO
STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND
EXPERT DEADLINES

v.
Hon. Judge William H. Orrick

21
22

THE CLOROX COMPANY,
Defendant.

23
24
25
26

Plaintiff Carol Benz and Defendant The Clorox Company (the “parties”), pursuant to Local
Rule 6.1(b), hereby request that the Court approve the following revised expert deadlines, to
which the parties have stipulated. The parties seek to extend the period of time in which to

27
designate initial and rebuttal experts and to conduct expert discovery. Extension of these
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES
CASE NO. 13-CV-01361 WHO

-1-

1

deadlines will not affect a date of any hearing or proceeding on the Court’s calendar and will not

2

prejudice either party. The extensions of time sought are as follows:

3

1.

The parties seek a revised deadline of January 15, 2014, by which to make initial expert

4
designations/disclosures.
5
6

2.

The parties seek a revised deadline of February 5, 2014, by which to make rebuttal
expert designations/disclosures.

7
8
9

3.

The parties seek a revised expert discovery cutoff of February 20, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

10
DATED: December 9, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

11
LAW OFFICES OF DENNIS JOHN WOODRUFF
12
13
By: /s/ Dennis John Woodruff
DENNIS JOHN WOODRUFF

14
15

Attorney for Plaintiff
Carol Benz

16
17

DATED: December 9, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

18
19

By: /s/ Susan W. Pangborn
SUSAN W. PANGBORN

20
21

Attorneys for Defendant
The Clorox Company

22
23

Attestation: Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Susan W. Pangborn,

24

hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Dennis John

25

Woodruff.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES
CASE NO. 13-CV-01361 WHO

-2-

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4

DATED: _December 9, 2013____________

_____________________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES
CASE NO. 13-CV-01361 WHO

-3-