Compassion Over Killing et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al

Filing 33

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 32 Stipulation to Correct Extended Time to Answer to August 27, 2014.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

STUART DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Thomas S. Hixson (SBN 193033)
[e-mail]
Jordan Ray (SBN 265346)
[e-mail]
Jennifer S. Rosen (SBN 274867)
[e-mail]

MICHAEL S. BLUME (PA 78525)
Director, Consumer Protection Branch
LAUREN HASH BELL (TX 24050728)
Trial Attorney, Consumer Protection Branch
[e-mail]

Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
[phone]
Fax: [phone]

450 5th St. NW, Room 6400 S
Washington, DC 20530
[phone]
Fax: [phone]

8
9
10

CHERYL LEAHY (SBN 270665)
Compassion Over Killing

Attorneys for Defendants

11

CARTER DILLARD (SBN 206276)
Animal Legal Defense Fund

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17

COMPASSION OVER KILLING et al.,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21
22
23

v.
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et
al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01385-VC

JOINT STIPULATION TO CORRECT
SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants submitted a Proposed Order attached to a Joint Stipulation Regarding

24 Scheduling for Filing Dispositive Briefing on May 5, 2014 (ECF No. 30) with a typographical
25 error. The date for Defendants to answer Plaintiffs on the Proposed Order should have been
26 August 27th, not August 4th. August 27th is the date agreed to by the parties and was the date set
27 forth in the Stipulation. The parties chose August 27th because they contemplated the
28

JOINT STIPULATION TO CORRECT SCHEDULING ORDER
3:13-cv-01385-VC

1 Defendants’ answer being due the same day as their opening brief. The Court entered an Order
2 adopting the mistaken August 4th deadline for the Defendants’ Answer from the Proposed Order
3 (ECF No. 31). The parties respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for the
4 Defendants to answer Plaintiffs’ Complaint to August 27th, as originally agreed to by the parties.
5
6 DATED: June 19, 2014
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Lauren H. Bell
LAUREN HASH BELL
Trial Attorney, Consumer Protection Branch
On behalf of Defendants
By: /s/ Jordan Ray
Jordan Ray
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Jordan Ray
Jennifer S. Rosen
On behalf of Plaintiffs

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION TO CORRECT SCHEDULING ORDER
3:13-cv-01385-VC

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Correct the Scheduling Order, and for

3 good cause shown,
4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

5

Defendants’ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to

6 and including August 27, 2014.
7

ENTERED this 25th day of June, 2014.
___

8
9
10
11

June 25, 2014
DATED: _______________

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER
4:13-cv-01385-VC

_________________________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge